This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Environmental & Energy,
Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Oct. 22, 2019

Is the Clean Water Act void for vagueness?

Recent CWA cases have produced fractured opinions, and circuits are split on how to interpret them — so can an ordinary layperson be expected to figure it out?

Michael F. Wright

Email: mfwrightlaw@gmail.com

Michael practices in Los Angeles.

See more...

The Clean Water Act prohibits the discharge of any pollutant into navigable waters, defined as "waters of the United States," without a federal permit. The perennial CWA conundrum is whether it applies to wetlands that indirectly connect, via non-navigable streams or creeks, to navigable waters often located miles away. The reach of the CWA in such cases remains unclear, largely because the U.S. Supreme Court's most recent attempt to define the reach of the CWA,

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up