This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Oct. 24, 2019

Will artificial intelligence please take the stand (part 2)

In this chapter, we will look at what others have said, or are doing in furtherance of AI testimony, introduces the concept of “machinal knowledge” in relation to court testimony (as opposed to personal knowledge), and then discusses the realities of this next evidentiary chapter in our courts.

Paul F. Rafferty

Paul is recognized as one of the top 20 AI lawyers in California.

See more...

In part one of this essay, the feasibility of admitting artificial intelligence testimony in court was questioned, preying upon vague definitional terms within our evidence code that do not recognize (nor seem to prohibit) this form of evidence. This final chapter looks at what others have said, or are doing in furtherance of AI testimony, introduces the c...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up