Civil Litigation,
Government
Nov. 13, 2019
Judge denies administrative record motion in Starbucks case
A superior court judge in the nine-year coffee labeling litigation has ruled against admitting thousands of documents into the administrative record related to a new state regulation finding a chemical found in coffee does not cause cancer in humans.
LOS ANGELES -- A superior court judge in the nine-year coffee labeling litigation has ruled against admitting thousands of documents into the administrative record related to a new state regulation finding a chemical in coffee does not cause cancer in humans.
The motion was an effort to preserve the record for likely appeals.
Raphael Metzger, representing the plaintiff against several coffee prod...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Consumer Law, Civil Litigation
Coffee industry sees wins in fight over labeling
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation
Decade-long coffee labeling case ends with summary judgment for defense
By Blaise Scemama
Civil Litigation, Government
Warning label requirements for chemical in coffee said to be unconstitutional
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation, Government
Plaintiff files 8 motions to beat coffee makers’ use of state regulation as defense
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation, Government
Group seeking warning labels on coffee wants to intervene in another case
By Malcolm Maclachlan
Civil Litigation
Proposition 65 should not include acrylamide, Chamber says
By Glenn Jeffers
Civil Litigation, Health Care & Hospital Law, Government
State’s OK of coffee risk admitted in long-running case
By Justin Kloczko
