This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government,
Criminal

Jan. 8, 2020

Limits on asset forfeiture may not have affected law enforcement budgets

A new report warns that changes to federal policies and other factors make it difficult to evaluate SB 443 until more data is collected in future years.

For years, people from a wide variety of political perspectives have urged changes to asset forfeiture laws. They got their wish in California in 2016 in the form of SB 443, a law that placed new restrictions on law enforcement's ability to seize property in drug cases.

A report from the Legislative Analyst's Office issued this week found the law does appear to have reduced and changed forfeiture efforts by law enforcement agencies ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up