This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Health Care & Hospital Law,
Government

Mar. 16, 2020

Coranavirus raises discussion of vaccinations

What would be the legal implications of requiring children to be vaccinated against a disease that might not hit them until old age?

Coranavirus raises discussion of vaccinations
Nursing students instruct first graders at Ethel Phillips Elementary School in Sacramento, on how to properly wash their hands to reduce the spread of the coronavirus, on Friday. (New York Times News Service)

What are the legal implications of requiring children to be vaccinated against a disease that might not hit them until old age?

That is a question some legal experts are considering in light of the fact the coronavirus so far is not affecting children. The mortality rate in China of people under the age of 20 is 0.1%, or one recorded death, according to a report by the Centers for Disease Control-China Joint Mission.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up