This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Criminal

Mar. 31, 2020

Video arraignments protect against virus, but provide no privacy

“I would say the biggest problem has been any degree of confidentiality of conversation between the client and the attorney. There is none,” Sonoma County Public Defender Kathleen Pozzi said.

Courts throughout the state have begun using video technology to allow criminal defendants to appear remotely for in-custody arraignment hearings in an effort to slow the spread of the coronavirus, but there are drawbacks.

While it’s not perfect, district attorneys and public defenders say it is the best way to maintain social distancing.

“It has been going pretty good under the circumstances,” So...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up