This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Real Estate/Development

Apr. 29, 2020

A tenant’s best friend: Ban pet restrictions in residential leases

There is a growing movement to eliminate the right of a landlord to impose a complete restriction on residential tenants having pets, or "animal companions" in modern parlance.

Daniel J. O'Connell

Law Offices of Daniel J. O'Connell

Daniel J. O'Connell practices landlord/tenant law in San Francisco.

See more...

I once saw a "no poets" clause in a lease. Obviously, it was a typographical error for "no pets." But the no-pets provision found in most residential leases is no less oppressive, and it should be abolished. There is a growing movement to eliminate the right of a landlord to impose a complete restriction on residential tenants having pets, or "animal companions" in modern parlance.

The No Kill Advocacy Center of Oakland is pushing fo...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up