This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Insurance,
Contracts

May 4, 2020

5 guidelines courts will follow to decide force majeure claims in COVID-19 litigation

The pandemic is not a get-out-of-jail-free card that will liberate parties from contracts across the board. But these unusual times will partially upend the typical rules that hold contracting parties to their bargain.

Marco Quazzo

Shareholder
Bartko LLP

For more than 30 years, Marco has litigated complex commercial and real estate disputes of all kinds.

See more...

COVID-19 litigation is coming soon to a courthouse near you. Litigants will disagree over whether the pandemic is a valid basis for terminating contracts, withholding rent from landlords, extending the time to perform contracts, and the like. Under what circumstances will courts release parties from their contractual obligations based on force majeure? Court precedents from historical force majeure events (e.g., 9/11, the World Wars, Prohibition, and the 1918 Spanish ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up