Letters,
Judges and Judiciary
May 7, 2020
Not 5, not 6, not 7 or even 8 jurors; the number is 12
In urging that eight-person criminal juries are good enough and would save money, Randolph A. Rogers overlooks the criminal jury’s most important purpose.
In urging that eight-person criminal juries are good enough and would save money, Randolph A. Rogers overlooks the criminal jury's most important purpose. ("COVID-19 and 8-person juries," April 27, 2020.)
Deciding whether a defendant's acts violate a particular law is only the narro...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Law Practice, Judges and Judiciary, Civil Litigation
COVID-19 and 8-person juries
Apr. 27, 2020
By Randolph A. Rogers
By Randolph A. Rogers
