This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government,
Criminal

May 26, 2020

Bill aims to curb some juror challenges

The law would significantly change that process of juror challenges in an unprecedented way, said Robert Weisberg, professor of law and director of Stanford’s Criminal Justice Center.

A state bill the author says is aimed at ending discrimination in jury selection has some prosecutors concerned because peremptory challenges of sleeping, unintelligible or hostile jurors would be invalidated unless the attorney could prove the challenge wasn't based on implicit bias.

"Under existing law, these are all valid reasons for a prosecutor or a defense attorney to ask to have a juror excused," said Michele Hanisee, preside...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up