U.S. Supreme Court,
Labor/Employment
Jun. 22, 2020
Bostock may not fully recognize gender identity, lawyers say
To extend discrimination protections to LGBTQ employees, the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark opinion on Title VII relied on a line of reasoning that falls short of recognizing the gender identities of transgender people, attorneys say.
To extend discrimination protections to LGBTQ employees, the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark opinion on Title VII relied on a line of reasoning that falls short of recognizing the gender identities of transgender people, attorneys say.
Last week's opinion asserted it is impossible for an employer to discriminate against an employee for being gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender without taking their sex into account. Examples used by ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In