This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Environmental & Energy,
Constitutional Law,
Administrative/Regulatory

May 14, 2021

Arguments: Does NGA delegate eminent domain powers to private parties?

The U.S. Supreme Court recently considered whether the Natural Gas Act delegates the federal government’s eminent domain power to private parties and whether such delegation violates sovereign immunity.

Michael Mills

Partner
Stoel Rives LLP

Michael is an experienced environmental lawyer who represents his clients in complex regulatory, compliance and litigation matters. He is also the former co-chair of the firm's Energy and Natural Resources Industry Group.

See more...

Sarah M. Taylor

Associate
Stoel Rives LLP

Email: sarah.taylor@stoel.com

UCLA SOL; Los Angeles CA

Sarah is in the firm's Environment, Land Use and Natural Resources group and has broad experience counseling clients in permitting mines, development projects, and mitigation banks and has defended clients against Clean Water Act violations.

See more...

On April 28, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. New Jersey case, in which the justices are considering two questions: (1) whether the Natural Gas Act delegates the federal government's eminent domain power to private parties, such as PennEast, and if such delegation abrogates state sovereign immunity; and (2) whether the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had jurisdiction over those proceeding...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up