Government,
California Supreme Court
Aug. 17, 2021
Ruling weighs mandatory, prohibitory injunction differences
Last week the California Supreme Court provided some welcome clarity to the rules that govern litigants’ rights and obligations during the interim period between the entry of judgment and the affirmance, or reversal, of that judgment on appeal.
In late 2018, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors appointed Dawn Rowe to fill the recently vacated position of 3rd District Supervisor. A citizens group sued, alleging that the process the board used to select Supervisor Rowe over competing candidates violated the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code Section 54950 et seq.). The trial court agreed and entered judgment for the citizens group. It then directed the board to rescind Supervisor Rowe's appointment and im...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In