This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Jul. 26, 2022

Lawyers divided on impact of treble damages ruling

“My thought is that both sides are exaggerating the potential impact, as is typical in the immediate reaction to a decision like this,” plaintiffs lawyer Steve N. Williams of Joseph Saveri Law Firm LLP said.

A California Supreme Court decision that will allow plaintiffs in some business cases to pursue treble damages could have far reaching consequences, some lawyers say.

Thursday’s ruling clarified that Penal Code Section 496 allows plaintiffs to pursue treble damages for theft of property, including by fraud, misrepresentation or breach of fiduciary duty. The opinion also means plaintiffs in business disputes can seek treble damages in every ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up