This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Real Estate/Development,
Land Use,
Government

Oct. 25, 2022

Developers cite ‘builder’s remedy’ in housing disputes with cities

A version of the idea goes back at least to the Housing Accountability Act. It states that if cities don’t comply with the state’s housing element requirements, developers who include minimum amounts of affordable housing can fast track new projects. Cities can only block these projects under limited circumstances, such as if they can show they harm public health and safety.

In 1982, the California Legislature responded to a looming housing crisis by passing the Housing Accountability Act. Forty years later, the Santa Monica City Council announced 12 projects with nearly 4,000 units of housing had been approved under the law.

In between came decades of wrangling in Sacramento and three recent court decisions. Attorneys representing developers say their clients had long been wary of going to court with the citie...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up