This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation & Arbitration

Jan. 12, 2024

An ‘ambiguity’ defense in ‘clean beauty’ litigation?

The absence of a standardized definition for “clean” allows manufacturers facing legal challenges to argue that additional materials clarify the term and counter claims of deception, notwithstanding three potential limitations.

Alexander M. Smith

Partner, Jenner & Block LLP

Phone: (213) 239-2622

Email: asmith@jenner.com

Harvard Univ Law School; Cambridge MA

"Clean beauty" has grown into a multi-billion dollar industry. Once considered niche products aimed only at the most discerning and eco-conscious consumers, "clean beauty" products are now available on the shelves of major retailers across the country. But the growing demand for "clean beauty" products has attracted the attention of the plaintiffs' class action bar. For example, one plaintiff has challenged Sephora's use of the "Clean at Sephora" certification because...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)