This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Jan. 18, 2024

A police warrantless blood draw ruled improper

An initially conscious and lucid suspect who becomes unconscious, or seemingly unconscious, requires law enforcement to obtain a search warrant before obtaining the blood of a DUI suspect.

Dmitry Gorin

Partner, Eisner Gorin LLP

Alan Eisner

Partner, Eisner Gorin LLP

Robert Hill

Associate, Eisner Gorin LLP

California implied consent laws require all drivers to voluntarily provide a breath or blood test as part of a police drunk driving investigation. In cases where there is injury or death, the police will not stop at a “refusal,” and seek a search warrant to obtain the blood pursuant to court order. It has been very common in our law firm’s criminal practice to defend a case where the police obtained a drug and/or alcohol reading despite the suspect refusing to coopera...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)