This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Procedure,
Civil Litigation

Mar. 19, 2024

In a fees-as-damages case, a Rule 26 stipulation can protect draft reports and communications

Civil litigators in California Superior Court should consider stipulating to apply Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for expert discovery, as it can make the trial expert’s role more efficient and avoid discovery disputes.

Ken Moscaret

Ken Moscaret, a former business litigator with trial experience, is a 33-year expert on attorney fee reasonableness and litigation management in high-stakes fee cases.

This art was created with the assistance of Shutterstock AI tools

In this column, I suggest a useful practice tip for civil litigators to consider in California Superior Court actions when retaining experts to testify at trial. As a longtime attorney fee expert who has opined dozens of times on fee reasonableness and litigation management for both fee claimants and fee opponents in large, complex, multimillion-dollar fee dispute cases, I have found that this practice tip can make a trial expert’s role more efficient.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)