This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Mar. 21, 2024

The decision may have been unanimous, but many issues went unaddressed

The decision leaves open many questions about the meaning and implementation of Section 3, especially the criteria of “congruence and proportionality” for congressional legislation. The Court will have another opportunity to clarify these issues in the upcoming appeal of U.S. v. Trump, the criminal case against the former president.

Philip M. Howe

Howe is a member of the California and Massachusetts State Bars, having last practiced in California in 2019.

Shutterstock

The U.S. Supreme Court has reversed the Colorado Supreme Court ruling that Donald Trump may appear on the Colorado 2024 presidential primary ballot. The decision was unanimous, but four Justices – Amy Coney Barrett, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson filed significant concurring opinions. Page references are to the pages in the decision as published by the Court. Trump v. Anderson, U.S. Supreme Court, 601 U.S. (March 4...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)