Entertainment & Sports
Apr. 5, 2024
No triable facts exist in athlete compensation case, plaintiffs say
The plaintiffs want summary judgment; NCAA wants the case dismissed.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys leading consolidated antitrust litigation against the NCAA and its conferences over restrictions on college athletes’ name, image and likeness rights told a federal judge in Oakland that the league has no defense that needs to go before a jury.
“First, the challenged concerted actions in restraint of trade are not in dispute; they are embodied in the NCAA’s written rules and enforcement mechanisms. Second, there is n...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In