This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Real Estate

Apr. 8, 2024

The fall of the Privette doctrine in landlord-tenant relationships

In Ramirez v. PK, the 1st District Court of Appeal ruled that the Privette doctrine is inapplicable in landlord-tenant relationships. The dissenting justice disagreed, arguing that the Privette doctrine should apply in situations where a lease requires work to be done on the property and the parties contemplate the work being performed by an independent contractor.

Garret D. Murai

Partner, Nomos LLP

Garret is the editor of the California Construction Law Blog at www.calconstructionlawblog.com.

Shutterstock

We've talked a fair bit in this column about the Privette doctrine which provides for a rebuttable presumption that a hirer is not liable for workplace injuries sustained by employees of hired parties.

We've also talked about its two exceptions: (1) The Hooker exception which provides for liability if the hirer retained control over the work being performed, negligently exercised that...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)