This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Torts/Personal Injury,
Construction

May 7, 2024

Brown v. Beach House Design & Development provides a cautionary tale for contractors

A recent appellate case highlights the importance of avoiding turning a blind eye to the use of equipment by subcontractors, and that the Privette doctrine does not protect a hirer from liability if a hirer retained control over the worksite and negligently exercised that control.

Shutterstock

It seems like we've been seeing a lot of Privette doctrine cases recently. Here's another: Brown v. Beach House Design & Development, 85 Cal.App.5th 516 (2022), which provides a cautionary tale for general contractors to watch what they include in their scope of work and how they manage projects.

The Beach House Case

Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)