Entertainment & Sports
May 23, 2024
Preparing players and lawyers for a new college sports landscape
The parties involved in House v. NCAA are discussing a potential settlement that would create a $2.7 billion fund for former athletes and a new revenue-sharing system for current athletes. This could affect the operational costs and staffing of the schools, and force them to balance the payments with Title IX compliance.
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/linkedin.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/twitter.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/threads.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/facebook.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/people/avatars/000/101/066/original/darras_frank_web.jpg?1605830349)
Frank N. Darras
Founding Partner, DarrasLaw
Email: frank@darraslaw.com
Western State Univ COL; Fullerton CA
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/articles/images/000/378/887/original/Shutterstock_2056329041_%281%29.jpg?1716415792)
May 2024 is poised to mark a pivotal shift in the landscape of collegiate athletics, as a significant proposed antitrust settlement could see the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and major college conferences pay billions in damages and establish a new revenue-sharing system with our college athletes.
Leading industry figures are set to convene and cast their votes on the conditions of a groundbreaking potential agreement spa...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In