Intellectual Property
Jun. 17, 2024
Attorneys for urologist who lost trade secrets case seek new trial
They claim it should not have been left up to a jury to decide patent claims relating to a penile implant. Opposing counsel say that's irrelevant to the case.
A Houston urologist who lost a trade secrets case brought by a Beverly Hills doctor over the design of a penile implant is seeking a new trial on grounds a Los Angeles federal judge erred by leaving the question of patent claim construction to the jury.
Texas-based defense attorneys for Dr. Robert Cornell in a motion Thursday argued U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall's purported error was inconsistent with a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that held judges, rather than j...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In