A Houston urologist who lost a trade secrets case brought by a Beverly Hills doctor over the design of a penile implant is seeking a new trial on grounds a Los Angeles federal judge erred by leaving the question of patent claim construction to the jury.
Texas-based defense attorneys for Dr. Robert Cornell in a motion Thursday argued U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall's purported error was inconsistent with a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that held judges, rather than j...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In