Civil Procedure,
California Supreme Court
Jan. 9, 2025
Ambiguity Times Three
Statutes can be ambiguous in three ways--semantic, syntactic, and contextual--as illustrated by recent California Supreme Court decisions, each requiring different interpretive approaches to determine legislative intent and resolve legal uncertainty.





The word "ambiguity," appropriately, can mean several things. What are they? The three ways that statutes can be ambiguous can be explained through last year's California Supreme Court opinions.
In statutory interpretation, ambiguity plays a facilitating role. Our Supreme Court has often told us that the overarching interpretative goal is to determine the Legislature's intent to effectuate the law's purpose. If there's no ambiguity in a statute's languag...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In