Securities
Feb. 3, 2025
Lucid executives face derivative suit over 'fantastical' production claims
Attorneys representing Lucid shareholders claim that an Aug. 8 ruling from U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín in a separate securities case set the precedent for a new derivative suit. The complaint accuses 10 executives of breaching fiduciary duties by misleading investors about the electric automaker's production goals before its public debut, resulting in "tens of billions" in lost market cap and "millions" in investor losses.




Attorneys representing shareholders in a derivative suit filed last week against executives for Lucid Group Inc., the company behind electric auto manufacturer Lucid Motors, claim that a ruling last year from U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín in a separate case "paved the way" for their clients to sue.
Their complaint, filed on Jan. 29 in the Northern District of California, accused Peter Rawlinson, Lucid's CEO, and nine other executives of breaching their ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In