
Photo: Johnny Michael/Shutterstock
A San Francisco federal judge granted summary judgment in favor of Apple in a product liability lawsuit filed by parents who claimed their 12-year-old son suffered permanent hearing damage after listening to the sound of a high-pitched Amber Alert through a pair of AirPods.
Apple's attorneys said summary judgment was warranted because the plaintiffs' liability theory was based on a novel theory of law that has "never been reported anywhere" in medical journals. ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In