This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Nov. 3, 2025

From code to canvas: The intellectual property debate in generative AI creations

The rise of generative AI challenges traditional intellectual property laws by raising unresolved questions about who owns AI-generated content -- the developer, the user or no one -- forcing legal systems to adapt while grappling with fundamental questions about creativity, ownership and responsibility.

Daniel B. Garrie

Neutral
JAMS

Cyber Security

Orange County

Cell: (212) 826-5351

Email: daniel@lawandforensics.com

See more...

Katherine E. Charonko

Certified e-Discovery Specialist
Bailey Glasser's ESI and Technology Practice Group

Katherine Charonko is a nationally recognized pioneer in Electronically Stored Information (ESI) and serves as Bailey Glasser's ESI and Technology Practice Group Leader. A Certified e-Discovery Specialist, she has built an e-Discovery practice, managing matters across the U.S. and internationally. Ms. Charonko plays a leadership role in multidistrict litigations nationwide, oversees firmwide e-Discovery across commercial, appellate, and corporate matters, and advises corporate clients on compliance. A frequent speaker and thought leader, she is recognized by Chambers USA and was named a 2026 Lawdragon Top 500 Leading Litigator in America.

See more...

From code to canvas: The intellectual property debate in generative AI creations
Shutterstock

Imagine a scenario where an artificial intelligence (AI) tool crafts a novel. The plot is intricate, the characters are well-developed and the narrative is compelling. It becomes a bestseller. But who gets the credit? The developer of the AI? The user who ran the program? Or does no one own it because it's the product of a machine?

In the rapidly evolving world of technology, generative AI stands out as a marvel. It's a tool th...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up