In mediation, instead of using the cliché "a good settlement leaves everyone a little unhappy," it might be more effective to ...

The Central District of California's new opt-out program gives attorneys a short amount of time to decide between district and...

An Arizona judge sanctioned two law firms and Alan Dershowitz for a frivolous voting system lawsuit, with the Ninth Circuit se...

California's 2024 PAGA amendments expand employers' ability to cure Labor Code violations but create a complicated early evalu...

Former government lawyers face unique ethical challenges under Rule of Professional Conduct 1.11, which extends broader confid...

In City and County of San Francisco v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down...

The Labor Commission, by misinterpreting the TAA, has left the communities of personal managers, attorneys, producers, publici...

Seventeen attorneys are seeking the disqualification of Judge Mary Ann Murphy, but based on her track record, she is known to ...

As the gaming industry evolves from physical sales to digital platforms, developers must navigate an intricate web of internat...

Despite California's mandated implicit bias training, little progress has been made in addressing systemic discrimination affe...

Lawyers who actively maintain relationships with clients through proactive communication, education, and follow-up are more li...

Cyber insurance has experienced rapid growth, market volatility, and evolving risks, and has not yet developed into a mature m...

Amid tariff uncertainty and market chaos, thoughtless 'copy and paste' M&A approaches will prove problematic as standard c...

California and Florida's differing responses to the insurance crisis show how crucial oversight and transparency are for prote...

The Rhode Island case SCLS Realty v. Town of Johnston brings the issue of "pretext" back into the spotlight, as prope...

Publicly criticizing individual judges, as seen in the case of San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins, harms judicial ...

Legal specialization, while essential for excellence, often stifles the curiosity needed to understand clients deeply and unco...

Montoya v. Superior Court places the causation burden on the defense when a negligent omission results in missing evi...

California's new Senate Bill 940, effective January 1, 2025, expands discovery rights in arbitration, aligning them with Calif...

A recent program hosted by the Ninth Circuit provided insights into the complexities of the Ninth Circuit's en banc process, c...

The EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), starting in 2023, targets carbon-heavy imports like steel and cement, pres...

The appellate court's decision to uphold a trial judge's ruling in In Re M.V. illuminates the broad discretion judges ...

Judge VanDyke's video raises concerns about the intersection of judicial conduct, public safety, and rhetoric in the ongoing g...

As we honor Patrick Henry's call for liberty, we face modern threats to judicial and legal independence; it's our duty to defe...

Expanding the concept of diversity beyond race to include other important factors can continue to build diverse and inclusive ...

Trump's executive orders targeting law firms threaten the legal profession, stifle political opposition, and limit rights enfo...

Patrick Henry's cry for liberty lives on in the fight to free Billy and Tina, two elephants at the LA Zoo, as advocates demand...

Tribal governments balance sovereignty, democracy and individual rights through elections, judicial systems and hiring prefere...

The firing of top military lawyers by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, seen as an attack on the rule of law, signals a dange...

Patrick Henry's call for liberty, which has long symbolized freedom for some, must be reexamined in light of its historical im...