People v. Rodriguez

(1) Was the accomplice testimony in this case sufficiently corroborated? (See People v. Romero and Self (2015) 62 Cal.4th 1, 36.) (2) Is the defendant's constitutional challenge to his 50 years to life sentence moot when, unlike in People v. Franklin (2016) 63 Cal.4th 261, his case was not remanded to the trial court to determine if he was provided an adequate opportunity to make a record of information that will be relevant to the Board of Parole Hearings as it fulfills its statutory obligations under Penal Code sections 3051 and 4801?