U.S. persons engaged in sensitive international communications with foreigners may not challenge statute authorizing government's surveillance of foreigners.
Related Content
U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law
High court should hear surveillance case
Sep. 22, 2017
By Andrew Crocker
By Andrew Crocker
U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Judges and Judiciary, Corporate, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Questions left open in new Spokeo decision
Aug. 18, 2017
By Randolph Hunter Pyle
By Randolph Hunter Pyle
Civil Litigation, Constitutional Law
Hacked class can sue, pre injury?
Jul. 30, 2015
By Tyler G. Newby
By Tyler G. Newby
Civil Litigation, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Data breaches and standing: a 38-million-victim question
Dec. 20, 2014
By Scott M. Lesowitz, Erik S. Syverson
By Scott M. Lesowitz, Erik S. Syverson
Civil Litigation, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Data holders must prepare for lawsuit wave after ruling
Aug. 14, 2015
By Scott M. Lesowitz, Erik S. Syverson
By Scott M. Lesowitz, Erik S. Syverson
Civil Litigation, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Data holders must prepare for lawsuit wave after ruling
Aug. 14, 2015
By Scott M. Lesowitz, Erik S. Syverson
By Scott M. Lesowitz, Erik S. Syverson
U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
9th Circuit issues Article III standing guidance in hacking context
Mar. 9, 2018
By Nicolas Sonnenburg
By Nicolas Sonnenburg
U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Data breach standing ruling invites review
Mar. 19, 2018
By Ian C. Ballon
By Ian C. Ballon
U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Circuit split underscores the need for strategic thinking in defending cybersecurity class actions
Jan. 23, 2019