Ruling by
Tani Cantil-SakauyeLower Court
California Courts of AppealLower Court Judge
Rupa S. Goswami
Penal Code Section 632(d)'s exclusionary remedy was superseded by Proposition 8 and since reenactments of Section 632(d) were merely technical, they were insufficient to revive the exclusionary remedy.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Criminal, Constitutional Law, California Supreme Court
Secret recording OK in criminal evidence, state high court says
Dec. 6, 2019
By Malcolm Maclachlan
By Malcolm Maclachlan
