Ruling by
Henry E. Needham Jr.Lower Court
Alameda County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Michael M. MarkmanPlaintiff properly alleged that termination was in violation of public policy because threat of losing his job if he failed to pay defendants was extortion.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Labor/Employment, California Courts of Appeal
Ruling broadens public policy in wrongful termination claims
May 26, 2020
By William M. Crosby
By William M. Crosby
