Ruling by
Patricia GuerreroLower Court
San Diego County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
David M. RubinArbitrator's ex parte communication with opposing counsel showed his bias against plaintiff and his failure to disclose this communication was grounds to vacate arbitration award.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, California Courts of Appeal, Alternative Dispute Resolution
Ruling will help to safeguard a fair arbitration process
May 14, 2021
By Benjamin T. Ikuta
By Benjamin T. Ikuta
California Courts of Appeal, Alternative Dispute Resolution
Ex parte communication leads to arbitrator’s disqualification
Jun. 8, 2021
By Marc D. Alexander
By Marc D. Alexander
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Arbitrator disclosure: designed to ensure fairness
Jan. 31, 2024
By Tricia A. Bigelow
By Tricia A. Bigelow
