Ruling by
Tani Cantil-SakauyeLower Court
California Courts of AppealLower Court Judge
Douglas P. MillerPlaintiff's 18th birthday should have been excluded pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 12 in calculating when statute of limitations period started running after tolling during minority ended.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court
State Supreme Court belatedly recognizes that 19th century statute of limitations decision lacks precedential value
Jul. 29, 2021
By Scott P. Dixler, Sarah E. Hamill
By Scott P. Dixler, Sarah E. Hamill
