Ruling by
James A. RichmanLower Court
San Francisco County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Richard B. Ulmer Jr.Restaurants' business interruption claim failed because mere loss of use of physical property to generate business income, without physical impact on the property, did not give rise to insurance coverage for direct physical loss.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Litigation & Arbitration, Insurance
COVID-19 business interruption cases
Nov. 14, 2022
By Bruce A. Broillet, Jenna Edzant
By Bruce A. Broillet, Jenna Edzant
