Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency

Ruling by

Lower Court

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Lower Court Judge

concurring Judge(s)

Clarence Thomas
Elena Kagan
Brett M. Kavanaugh

Environmental Protection Agency's attempt to assert jurisdiction over private property's wetlands through the Clean Water Act failed because it required clearer congressional language to do so.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Already a subscriber?
Sign In

Filter by date

Exact Phrase

Not the words

At least one of the words

All the words

Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency

Ruling by

Lower Court

Lower Court Judge

concurring Judge(s)

Enewsletter Sign-up

Related Content

U.S. Supreme Court, Land Use

The U.S. Supreme Court gives new contours to the term "wetland" in Sackett v. EPA

U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, Administrative/Regulatory

The demise of the Chevron Doctrine