Montrose Chemical Corp. of California v. Superior Court (Canadian Universal Insurance Co.)
Ruling by
Anne H. EgertonLower Court
Los Angeles County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Lawrence P. RiffWhere petitioner was advancing exactly the same interpretation of insurance policy language that past case authorities had already discounted, trial court did not err in excluding proffered evidence to settle language's purported ambiguity.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
