Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
99CA0089
|
Salas v. Grancare Inc.
Complaint against nursing home for substandard care may be commenced in district court without first exhausting administrative remedies. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jul. 3, 2001 | |
00-191
|
Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee
Limitations on political expenditures coordinated with a candidate may be limited under federal election law. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jul. 2, 2001 | |
B145442
|
Briggs v. Superior Court (People)
Judge's disqualification is untimely because he had already conducted pretrial hearing involving contested fact issues. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
B142024
|
Solovij v. Gourley
DMV hearing officer may not rely on officer's unsworn report to determine whether probable cause for arrest existed. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | |
00-5111
|
Dikeman v. Halter
Substantial evidence did not support administrative judge's finding that plaintiff had transferable skills and did not qualify for social security disability benefits. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 28, 2001 | |
00-16090
|
Holohan v. Massanari
Administrative law judge commits reversible error in finding claimant is not disabled when record contains substantial evidence to support finding of disability . |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 28, 2001 | |
99-17123
|
CHW West Bay v. Thompson
Hospital was wrongfully denied bonus incentive when added costs were due to factors beyond its control. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 28, 2001 | |
01-70031
|
In re California Power Exchange Corp.
California municipality and public utility aren't entitled to extraordinary relief from nonfinal Federal Energy Regulatory Commission orders restructuring state's electricity market. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 28, 2001 | |
99-1434
|
U.S. v. Mead Corp.
Imposition of tariff by Customs Service has persuasive force and must be assessed by lower court. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 25, 2001 | |
99CA2135
|
Raygor v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of El Paso
County gave adequate notice of public meeting for consideration of zoning plan. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 25, 2001 | |
98-1569
|
United States v. Mead Corp.
Customs Service's tariff classification rulings are not entitled to judicial deference since they don't have the force of law. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 18, 2001 | |
00-2412
|
Martinez v. Department of Health & Human Services
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 13, 2001 | |
99-0332
|
Shaffer v. Arizona State Liquor Board
In administrative decision appeals, superior court is not an independent fact finder that reweighs evidence without deference to administrative proceedings. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 12, 2001 | |
00-0016
|
Pinedo v. Arizona Department of Transportation
Administrative law judge exceeds limited scope of authority in considering constitutionality of traffic stop in driver's license suspension hearing. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 11, 2001 | |
68588-6
|
Mcgee Guest Home Inc. v. Department of Social & Health Services
Department of Social and Health Services' two-tiered system of reimbursement for congregate care facilities not subject to rule making requirement under APA. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 20, 2001 | |
A085000
|
Eckert v. Bay Area Cellular Telephone Co.
Disputes over cellular telephone rates for hearing impaired are to be resolved by utilities commission, not court. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 18, 2001 | |
99-16927
|
Mohave Valley Irrigation & Drainage District v. Norton
River water received by landowners in Arizona district must be counted toward district's overall entitlement to water. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 17, 2001 | |
00-7094
|
Briggs v. Massanari
Commissioner erred by denying disability benefits to minor without considering his standardized test scores or explaining why testimony was not credible. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 16, 2001 | |
G023019
|
Lin v. State of California
Dentists are not entitled to administrative hearing on regulation requiring state authorization before providing services to Denti-Cal patients. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 16, 2001 | |
99-9537
|
Sims v. Apfel
Social Security claimant must raise issue at administrative appeal level before issue may be reviewed by federal court. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 15, 2001 | |
67294-6
|
University of Washington v. Allan
Wife of university professor lacks standing to seek declaratory judgment to invalidate university procedures for adjudicating disciplinary matters. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 15, 2001 | |
18346-7
|
Merseal v. State of Washington Department of Licensing
Deferred criminal prosecution does not divest state of authority to suspend defendant's commercial driver's license. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 11, 2001 | |
00-2030
|
Rylee v. Massanari
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 9, 2001 | |
98-71513
|
Chao v. Symms Fruit Ranch Inc.
When safety violation is found, Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission has authority to deem violation de minimis and enter no sanction. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 9, 2001 | |
99-9508
|
Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority v. FAA
State agency's ban on scheduled passenger service is preempted by federal statute and Supremacy Clause. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 9, 2001 | |
00-56561
|
City of San Diego v. Whitman
Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction where EPA letter to city doesn't constitute final agency action. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 9, 2001 | |
99-17188
|
Deorle v Rutherford
No qualified immunity for police officer who used excessive force in subduing man displaying erratic behavior. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 9, 2001 | |
99-56486
|
Tonapetyan v. Halter
Administrative law judge's failure to fully develop record with respect to possible mental impairment constitutes reversible error. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 9, 2001 | |
99CA1685
|
Allen Homesite Group v. Colorado Water Quality Control Division
Review of administrative agency action must be filed within 30 days of administrative ruling. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 6, 2001 | |
24910-3
|
Northwest Ecosystem Alliance v. Washington Forest Practices Board
Under Administrative Procedure Act, court has authority to review validity of agency's existing regulations. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 6, 2001 |