| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
B160121
|
People v. Muhammad
Court improperly imposed sanctions against prosecutor where no court order was violated. |
Attorneys |
|
Aug. 19, 2003 | |
|
G031093
|
Koo v. Rubio's Restaurants Inc.
It was abuse of discretion for court to disqualify law firm based on attorney's erroneous statement that firm represented both managers and corporation. |
Attorneys |
|
Aug. 11, 2003 | |
|
96-04662
|
Davis v. State Bar
Attorney breaches fiduciary duties to corporate client when attorney chooses to advise one board member against interests of others. |
Attorneys |
|
Aug. 11, 2003 | |
|
A099643
|
Moore v. Anderson Zeigler Disharoon Gallagher & Gray
Attorney has no duty to beneficiaries of will to determine whether client has testamentary capacity to amend will. |
Attorneys |
|
Aug. 11, 2003 | |
|
S101964
|
Viner v. Sweet
When alleged malpractice occurred in performance of transactional work, client must still prove causation element. |
Attorneys |
|
Aug. 11, 2003 | |
|
B159278
|
Hayward v. Ventura Volvo
Court is not limited in awarding attorney fees to those incurred by plaintiff under contingency fee contract. |
Attorneys |
|
Jul. 29, 2003 | |
|
G029927
|
Dawson v. Toledano
Malpractice per se is not presumed when attorney is sanctioned; res judicata and collateral estoppel don't bar attorney from trial on merits. |
Attorneys |
|
Jul. 28, 2003 | |
|
D041785
|
Scripps Health v. Superior Court (Reynolds)
Confidential occurrence reports prepared by hospital were protected by attorney-client privilege. |
Attorneys |
|
Jul. 28, 2003 | |
|
01-04164
|
In re Gorman
Attorney who willfully failed to comply with terms of disciplinary probation deserves actual suspension. |
Attorneys |
|
Jul. 18, 2003 | |
|
G031852
|
Hetos Investments Ltd. v. Kurtin
Law firm challenging validity of provision in legal document that it prepared need not be disqualified. |
Attorneys |
|
Jul. 1, 2003 | |
|
01-30151
|
U.S. v. Danielson
Where government interfered with defendant's attorney-client relationship, it must prove non-use of privileged information by preponderance of evidence. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
|
00-16378
|
Kasza v. Whitman
Court didn't err in finding plaintiffs weren't entitled to attorney fees nor in approving redaction of previously sealed transcript before unsealing it. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
|
A091877
|
Ferguson v. Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein LLP
Clients who participated in class action settlement cannot sue attorneys for lost potential punitive damages. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 9, 2003 | |
|
D039601
|
Panther v. Park
Law firm properly implemented effective screening measures to prevent imputed disqualification. |
Attorneys |
|
May 28, 2003 | |
|
C038317
|
Brockey v. Moore
Court upholds permanent injunction against defendant who offered typing services in eviction cases. |
Attorneys |
|
May 28, 2003 | |
|
B151730
|
Shafer v. Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & Gladstone
Attorney hired by insurer to provide coverage advice may be liable to third party for making fraudulent statements. |
Attorneys |
|
May 27, 2003 | |
|
B155518
|
Olson v. Cohen
Law corporation that failed to register with state bar is not required to disgorge legal fees. |
Attorneys |
|
May 21, 2003 | |
|
01-1325
|
Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington
Requiring client funds that could not generate net earnings for client be deposited in IOLTA account is not regulatory taking. |
Attorneys |
|
Apr. 1, 2003 | |
|
01-30414
|
U.S. v. Manchester Farming Partnership
Although government's conduct was below standards, court did not err when it denied defendant's Hyde Amendment request for attorney fees and costs. |
Attorneys |
|
Mar. 21, 2003 | |
|
01-10156
|
U.S. v. Shwayder
Improper use of guilt-assuming hypothetical questions in cross-examination of character witnesses did not affect defendant's substantial rights. |
Attorneys |
|
Feb. 18, 2003 | |
|
G028285
|
Morrison v. Rudolph
Attorney evaluating whether to initiate legal proceedings may generally rely on information provided by client. |
Attorneys |
|
Feb. 4, 2003 | |
|
B151748
|
Hu v. Fang
Paralegal's mistake is attributable to attorney responsible for supervising paralegal. |
Attorneys |
|
Feb. 4, 2003 | |
|
B149866
|
Harris v. Grimes
Court improperly applied res judicata to federal court ruling when ruling in favor of attorney in malpractice action. |
Attorneys |
|
Feb. 4, 2003 | |
|
B152366
|
Leasequip Inc. Dapeer
In legal malpractice action, attorney is equitably estopped from asserting statute of limitation defense where client relied on attorney's improper advice. |
Attorneys |
|
Jan. 29, 2003 | |
|
00-10143
|
U.S. v. Elder
Defense counsel handcuffed and removed from court for contemptuous behavior did not violate defendant's due process rights. |
Attorneys |
|
Jan. 14, 2003 | |
|
01-35430
|
Native Village of Quinhagak v. United States
As prevailing parties in fishing rights litigation, Alaskan villagers are entitled to award of attorney fees. |
Attorneys |
|
Jan. 9, 2003 | |
|
S098007
|
Chambers v. Kay
Attorneys' fee-splitting agreement is invalid because of attorneys' failure to get client's consent to agreement. |
Attorneys |
|
Jan. 7, 2003 | |
|
98-O-02234
|
Matter of Peavey
Attorney found culpable of misconduct based on loan transactions with clients. |
Attorneys |
|
Jan. 7, 2003 | |
|
96-O-08095
|
Valinoti v. State Bar
Attorney's reliance on non-attorney services providers to prepare and file immigration applications for aliens violates federal law. |
Attorneys |
|
Jan. 6, 2003 | |
|
B143328
|
Mix v. Tumanjan Development Corp.
Attorney who acted pro se in contract action may recover reasonable fees for assisting counsel. |
Attorneys |
|
Dec. 3, 2002 |
