For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Shamsian v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Plaintiff alleging violation of drinking water act must bring suit within one-year limitations period. 		Civil Procedure Oct. 3, 2003
Luri v. Greenwald
Party that failed to file opposition to summary judgment motion was not entitled to mandatory relief for attorney's neglect. 		Civil Procedure Oct. 3, 2003
Mills v. Forestex Co.
No triable issues of fact exist to warrant equitable tolling of limitations period. 		Civil Procedure Oct. 2, 2003
Golfland Entertainment Centers Inc. v. Superior Court (Nunez)
Discovery order which prohibited mental examiner from eliciting 'narrative' responses was improper. 		Civil Procedure Oct. 2, 2003
Lomeli v. Dept. of Corrections (State Personnel Board)
Petitioner's writ to compel California Dept. of Corrections to comply with administrative order was not premature. 		Civil Procedure Oct. 2, 2003
Haney v. City of Los Angeles
Police officer's discharge for having unauthorized barbecue on Memorial Day was within statute of limitations. 		Civil Procedure Oct. 2, 2003
Black Diamond Asphalt Inc. v. Superior Court (California Insurance Guarantee Assn.)
Venue is permitted in county where obligation that plaintiff seeks to enforce is strictly statutory. 		Civil Procedure Oct. 2, 2003
Simms v. NPCK Enterprises Inc.
Plaintiffs did not waive right to arbitration by filing lawsuit and seeking restraining order against defendant. 		Civil Procedure Oct. 2, 2003
Camarillo v. Vaage
Malpractice claim against unknown defendant is tolled where Code of Civil Procedure Section 364 notice is properly sent to known potential defendants. 		Civil Procedure Oct. 2, 2003
Fittante v. Palm Springs Motors Inc.
Agreement that bound employee to arbitrate dispute against employer was enforceable. 		Civil Procedure Oct. 1, 2003
Service Employees International Union v Daughters of Charity Health Systems, Inc.
District court erred in dismissing union's case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state claim. 		Civil Procedure Sep. 30, 2003
Jarrow Formulas Inc. v. LaMarche
Lawsuit for malicious prosecution is subject to motion to strike. 		Civil Procedure Sep. 29, 2003
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Ontario Aircraft Services Inc.
Insurer's failure to advise of applicable limitations period estopped them from later asserting similar defense. 		Civil Procedure Sep. 26, 2003
Lund v. San Joaquin Valley Railroad
Under Federal Employers' Liability Act, award of prejudgment interest to injured employee isn't unauthorized award of damages. 		Civil Procedure Sep. 24, 2003
Peracchi v. Superior Court (People)
Court errs in denying motion to disqualify trial judge, following appeal and remand for resentencing, when he was original judge in previous trial. 		Civil Procedure Sep. 24, 2003
Albingia Versicherungs A.G. v. Schenker International Inc.
District court had supplemental jurisdiction of state claims after federal question which justified removal disappeared. 		Civil Procedure Sep. 23, 2003
Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services Inc.
Private parties have no authority to expand allowable review of arbitration awards under Federal Arbitration Act. 		Civil Procedure Sep. 9, 2003
Southern California Edison v. Lynch
Wholesale generators may not intervene as matter of right based on claim against third-party debtor. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 26, 2003
Bianchi v. Rylaarsdam (Bank of America National Trust & Savings Assn.)
Federal district court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear appeal from final judgment of state court. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 19, 2003
Zapanta v. Universal Care Inc.
Court improperly granted summary judgment motion where plaintiffs voluntarily filed request for dismissal. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 19, 2003
Iliff v. Dustrud
Application for renewal of default judgment was timely within 10-year period. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 19, 2003
Muccianti v. Willow Creek Care Center
Motion to vacate judgment is not granted where interests of nonparties and public would be adversely affected. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 19, 2003
Cruz. v. Pacificare Health Systems Inc.
Claims under Consumer Legal Remedies Act to enjoin unfair competition and misleading advertising are not arbitrable. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 19, 2003
Carpinteria Valley Farms v. The County of Santa Barbara
Plaintiff's claims against county aren't takings claims, but are 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 claims ripe for review. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 18, 2003
Nutrition Now, Inc. v. Superior Court (Cappseals Inc.)
Court may determine whether out-of-state settlement was reached in good faith for purposes of equitable allocation among joint tortfeasors. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 13, 2003
Stern v. Superior Court (Getz, Krycler & Jakubovits)
Trial court, without providing notice and opportunity to present opposition, erroneously ordered action reclassified as limited civil case. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 13, 2003
Diamond Woodworks Inc. v. Argonaut Insurance Co.
Punitive damages award of $5.5 million does not comport with due process. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 12, 2003
Geneva Towers LP v. City and County of San Francisco
Statute of limitations to sue city that fails to respond to request for property-tax refund is six months. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 12, 2003
Kalai v. Gray
There is no waiver of right to arbitrate by filing suit in court; attorney fees must be awarded per arbitration agreement. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 11, 2003
Kahn v. Lasorda's Dugout Inc.
Trial court should have considered whether to accept copies of documents rather than originals at default prove-up hearing. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 11, 2003
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.