For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

REPLACEMENT COPY OF TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2025

Name Category Published
Smagin v. Yegiazaryan
A RICO plaintiff can satisfy the "domestic injury" standing requirement for a judgment of a foreign arbitration award by showing that the judgment's rights existed domestically. 		Civil Procedure 9th Jun. 10, 2022
Dept. of Water Resources Environmental Impact Cases
The trial court applied the wrong standard in deciding whether the causation prong of the catalyst theory entitled plaintiffs to recovery of attorney fees. 		Civil Procedure 3DCA Jun. 6, 2022
Owino v. CoreCivic
Detainees in private immigration detention center could certify their classes for a class action since there was a common question about the prison's policies that predominated individual detainees' claims. 		Civil Procedure 9th Jun. 3, 2022
Burri Law PA v. Skurla
Jurisdiction was proper in Arizona for attorney's defamation and contract interference claims since Catholic bishops' statements were purposefully directed toward attorney's Arizona employment contract and lawsuit. 		Civil Procedure 9th Jun. 3, 2022
Amended Opinion: Ratha v. Phatthana Seafood
Cambodian villagers failed to establish that their claims against a Thai company was a valid extraterritorial application of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act. 		Civil Procedure 9th Jun. 1, 2022
Martin v. Pierce County, et al.
Washington's arbitration declination declaration requirement before commencing a medical malpractice suit did not apply in federal court because it conflicted with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 3 and 8. 		Civil Procedure 9th May 31, 2022
Casey v. Hill
Trial court erred in ruling that Missouri court's exercise of personal jurisdiction violated due process because trial court ignored the material jurisdictional facts that were sufficient to satisfy the jurisdictional inquiry. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/1 May 24, 2022
Cardenas v. Horizon Senior Living, Inc.
The statute of limitations for wrongful death claim against the senior living facility was not revived by felony convictions against the facility's staff under Code of Civil Procedure Section 340.3. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/6 May 23, 2022
Modification: Divino Plastic Surgery, Inc. v. Superior Court (Espinoza)
Statutory deadline for leave to include punitive damages in a health care provider negligence claim demanded strict compliance where plaintiffs were aware of facts necessary to move to amend. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/1 May 23, 2022
Padilla v. City of San Jose
Plaintiffs were required to pay garbage collection fees under protest before filing their putative class action challenging those charges. 		Civil Procedure 6DCA May 23, 2022
Unite Here Local 30 v. Sycuan Band
District court did not abuse its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over counterclaim that rested on an issue of contract validity because it was for the arbitrator to decide. 		Civil Procedure 9th May 23, 2022
State of Arizona v. Yellen
Arizona had standing for a constitutional challenge to the American Rescue Plan Act's offset provision since it was credible that it would be forced to repay federal funds. 		Civil Procedure 9th May 20, 2022
CPC Patent Technologies v. Apple, Inc.
Discovery petitions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1782 are case-dispositive decisions to be reviewed de novo by the district court. 		Civil Procedure 9th May 19, 2022
People v. Nance
Defendant was not entitled to the standard of review for a directed verdict since the denial of his application for outpatient treatment was not made by a jury. 		Civil Procedure 3DCA May 16, 2022
Pacific Fertility Cases
A petition for a writ of mandate is the exclusive means to obtain appellate review of a court's good faith settlement determination. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/1 May 13, 2022
Evans v. Synopsys
Notwithstanding the district court's statements that intervenor's time to file a notice of appeal was preserved, intervenor's failure to formally request an extension mandated dismissal of the appeal. 		Civil Procedure 9th May 13, 2022
Amato v. Downs
Trial court erred by deeming plaintiff's failure to follow a local court rule as a waiver of a jury trial. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/2 May 10, 2022
Bock v. State of Washington
Plaintiffs were judicially estopped since they agreed to the statutorily mandated forfeiture of property by signing a Stipulation to Police Reports and Order of Continuance. 		Civil Procedure 9th May 10, 2022
Bullock v. City of Antioch
Issue preclusion did not bar retired employees' claim against city because the record provided no basis for concluding that retirees should reasonably have expected to be bound by union's prior grievance proceeding. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/5 May 9, 2022
Kubiak v. County of Ravalli
Plaintiff's acceptance of a Rule 68 offer of judgment prevailed over the court's grant of summary judgment for defendant that was granted while the offer was pending. 		Civil Procedure 9th May 4, 2022
Grove v. Juul Labs, Inc.
Former employee could not bring shareholder class action in California since forum selection provision in Juul's corporate charter was only voidable by an employee, not a shareholder. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/3 Apr. 29, 2022
Hahn v. New York Air Brake LLC
In an asbestos suit, a manufacturer was properly substituted for a Doe defendant where plaintiff did not discover facts to establish a cause of action against the manufacturer until after the complaint was filed. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/5 Apr. 27, 2022
Lincoln v. Lopez
Appellant's claim of electioneering was denied since the legislature did not intend an absolute 100-foot prohibition on electioneering near drop boxes and the other candidate's violation, if any, was inadvertent. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/2 Apr. 27, 2022
State of California v. Superior Court (Paniagua)
Descendants of man killed by a vehicle on an allegedly dangerous roadway had right to unredacted accident reports since the other accidents occurred in the same location under similar circumstances. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/6 Apr. 27, 2022
Divino Plastic Surgery, Inc. v. Superior Court
Statutory deadline for leave to include punitive damages in a health care provider negligence claim demanded strict compliance where plaintiffs were aware of facts necessary to move to amend. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/1 Apr. 26, 2022
County of San Mateo v. Chevron
Federal courts did not have jurisdiction over counties' global-warming-related state law claims against several energy companies. 		Civil Procedure 9th Apr. 20, 2022
Ross v. Superior Court (County of Riverside)
Trial court erred by granting county's motion to quash subpoena of district attorney for deposition regarding county lawyers' alleged attempt to alter testimony about a material witness' credibility. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/1 Apr. 20, 2022
HiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn
The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act did not preempt plaintiff's state law claims since plaintiff showed serious questions as to whether access "without authorization" was inapplicable to public LinkedIn profiles. 		Civil Procedure 9th Apr. 19, 2022
Trendsettah USA v. Swisher Int'l
Plaintiff's presentation of misleading financial documents did not constitute fraud on the court since there was no clear and convincing evidence that it was intentional or aimed at the court. 		Civil Procedure 9th Apr. 18, 2022
Shoner v. Carrier Corp.
Federal court lacked jurisdiction because while attorneys' fees are not "costs" under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and may be included in the amount in controversy, they were unavailable under plaintiff's claims. 		Civil Procedure 9th Apr. 15, 2022
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.