For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

REPLACEMENT COPY OF TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2025

Name Category Published
B.K. v. Snyder
Where court can assess 'statewide policies and practices' as to Arizona's care of foster children, general class of foster children claiming due process violations suitable for certification. 		Civil Procedure 9th Apr. 29, 2019
NTCH-WA, Inc. v. ZTE Corporation
Preclusive effects of a prior federal diversity judgment confirming an arbitration award are determined by reference to the law of the state where the rendering court sat. 		Civil Procedure 9th Apr. 26, 2019
Western Watersheds Project v. Grimm
Plaintiffs alleging procedural injury need only show they have a procedural right that, if exercised, even if only on a temporary basis, could protect their concrete interests. 		Civil Procedure 9th Apr. 24, 2019
Du-All Safety, LLC v. Superior Court
Defendant had right to supplement its expert witness exchange by adding experts to cover subjects on which other party indicated it planned to offer expert testimony; thus, trial court erred. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/2 Apr. 22, 2019
Cox v. Griffin
Appellant barred from adding theory of malicious prosecution on appeal because it was not litigated in the trial court, and the facts presented at trial were conflicting rather than undisputed. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/1 Apr. 18, 2019
U.S. v. Lozoya
Assault on commercial flight occurred before entering Central District of California's airspace and 18 U.S.C. Section 3237(a) pertains to offenses involving transportation in interstate commerce or foreign commerce; thus, venue was improper. 		Civil Procedure 9th Apr. 12, 2019
Modification: Long v. Forty-Niners Football Co., LLC
Plaintiff who voluntarily dismissed his state case just before trial in favor of ultimately unsuccessful federal litigation may not claim equitable tolling to bring a duplicative action in state court. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/4 Apr. 10, 2019
Stokes v. Muschinske
Trial court could have reasonably inferred that juror's failure to disclose two prior lawsuits he was involved in was unintentional; there were no substantive hearings and no indication he was actively involved. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/8 Apr. 10, 2019
Demarest v. HSBC Bank USA
Because trustee of traditional trust was sued in its own name, its citizenship was all that mattered for diversity purposes and not citizenship of trust's investors; thus, diversity jurisdiction was proper. 		Civil Procedure 9th Apr. 9, 2019
Ryze Claim Solutions LLC v. Superior Court
Forum selection clauses may be given effect, in the court's discretion and in the absence of a showing that enforcement of a given clause would be unfair and unreasonable. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/3 Apr. 5, 2019
Friends of Spring Street v. Nevada City
Trial court erroneously determined plaintiff was not successful at a practical level, and abused its discretion finding plaintiff did not enforce an important right affecting public interests. 		Civil Procedure 3DCA Apr. 5, 2019
Modification: Sass v. Cohen
'Cassel' not good law; complaint for accounting must plead specific damage amount sought; amount awarded in default judgment over amount sought is void. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/2 Apr. 5, 2019
Rel v. Pacific Bell Mobile Services
The death knell doctrine does not apply to a pretrial order that does not qualify as a trial for Code of Civil Procedure Section 583.310 purposes. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/5 Apr. 2, 2019
Mesa RHF Partners v. City of Los Angeles
Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6 court may retain jurisdiction to enforce settlement if request is made by parties themselves; thus, trial court was without jurisdiction when counsel made such request. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/1 Apr. 2, 2019
Chen v. Berenjian
Litigation privilege does not extend to levying on property pursuant to a scheme to defeat a creditor's rights, violating the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act, because such conduct is not communicative. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/3 Apr. 1, 2019
Last Frontier Healthcare Dist. v. Superior Ct.
Giving notice of intent to sue under Code of Civil Procedure Section 364 does not impact jurisdictional deadlines underlying an application for relief from the Government Claims Act. 		Civil Procedure 3DCA Mar. 28, 2019
Long v. Forty Niners Football Co.
Plaintiff who voluntarily dismissed his state case just before trial in favor of ultimately unsuccessful federal litigation may not claim equitable tolling to bring a duplicative action in state court. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/4 Mar. 28, 2019
Zakk v. Diesel
An amended complaint consistent with a previous complaint's allegations of a specific contract, but omitting allegations of an overarching contract between the parties, was not a sham pleading. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/4 Mar. 27, 2019
Republic of Sudan v. Harrison
When serving civil process on a foreign state under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. Section 1608(a)(3) requires mailing directly to the foreign minister's office in the foreign state. 		Civil Procedure USSC Mar. 27, 2019
CA Dept. of Finance v. City of Merced
A party who fails to plead affirmative defenses in its initial answer waives those defenses; thus, the trial court properly declined consideration of the validity of the merits. 		Civil Procedure 3DCA Mar. 26, 2019
Myers v. Raley's
Where trial court denies class certification in cursory order lacking substantive analysis, that lack of analysis 'is fatal' and requires remand for further review. 		Civil Procedure 3DCA Mar. 14, 2019
Shrewsbury Management, Inc. v. Superior Court
Discovery mechanisms in judgment debtor examination should be 'broadly construed;' subpoena duces tecum may issue to third parties other than those who control debtor's finances or property. 		Civil Procedure 6DCA Mar. 13, 2019
Centex Homes v. R-Help Construction Co., Inc.
When a claim alleges facts giving rise to a duty to defend under an indemnity agreement, the duty begins upon proper tender of defense as a matter of law. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/6 Mar. 12, 2019
Sass v. Cohen
'Cassel' not good law; complaint for accounting must plead specific damage amount sought; amount awarded in default judgment over amount sought is void. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/2 Mar. 11, 2019
Marriage of Wong
When all orders issued in a dispute would technically be postjudgment orders, injunctive orders are appealable and preliminary orders regarding discovery or joinder are not. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/3 Mar. 11, 2019
Anderson v. State Farm
The thirty-day removal clock under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1446(b)(1) begins to run when the defendant, not a statutorily designated agent, receives the complaint. 		Civil Procedure 9th Mar. 11, 2019
Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert
Non-jurisdictional nature of Rule 23(f) does not render it appropriate for equitable tolling; since other rules clearly speak to firm nature of rule's 14-day deadline, court lacks jurisdiction to toll it. 		Civil Procedure USSC Feb. 27, 2019
Fierro v. Landry's Restaurant, Inc.
U.S. Supreme Court's 'China Agritech' rule precluding tolling of class claims pending class certification applicable to California state courts. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/1 Feb. 20, 2019
Korman v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.
A federal forum selection clause is enforceable so long as no evidence is presented showing the clause to be unreasonable. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/4 Feb. 15, 2019
Jimenez-Sanchez v. Dark Horse Express, Inc.
Because employer paid employees on a piece-rate basis, separate compensation for rest breaks was required; thus, common factual and legal issues were presented as common questions capable of determination on a class basis. 		Civil Procedure 5DCA Feb. 15, 2019
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.