Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10-80152
|
Coleman v. Estes Express Lines Inc.
Application for leave to appeal under Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 is granted where important unsettled question was present. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 30, 2010 | |
H033425
|
Dang v. Smith
Summary judgment is properly granted where plaintiff fails to support complaint with evidence of defendant’s negligence. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 30, 2010 | |
H032619
|
Golin v. Allenby
Court abuses its discretion in concluding that vexatious litigants are unlikely to prevail on merits with no legal or evidentiary basis. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 30, 2010 | |
B219289
|
BBA Aviation PLC v. Superior Court (Engen)
Court improperly imputes jurisdiction over parent company without establishing that company had minimum contacts beyond investing in its subsidiary company. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 23, 2010 | |
09-17040
|
Hillis v. Heineman
Filing of counterclaim or third-party complaint does not waive defense of improper venue asserted in answer. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 21, 2010 | |
10-56512
|
Lewis v. Verizon Communications Inc.
Defendant’s concession that some class members were billed for unauthorized charges places entire billings in controversy, thereby satisfying jurisdictional amount. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 18, 2010 | |
A125298
|
Abaya v. Spanish Ranch I L.P.
Court’s denial of motion to compel arbitration is proper given risk of inconsistent rulings on common issues if different forums are used. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 14, 2010 | |
E048799
|
Cumbre Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
Jury instruction on doctrine of fair procedure elements is proper although it was not identical to party’s requested wording. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 9, 2010 | |
B226902
|
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc. v. Superior Court (Braun)
Court errs in allowing presence of plaintiff's counsel in adjoining room to monitor psychiatric examination where such measures were not needed. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 9, 2010 | |
B221481
|
Laswell v. AG Seal Beach LLC
Denial of motion to compel arbitration based on presence of third-party defendants is improper where defendants were related to facility named in agreement. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 9, 2010 | |
S175855
|
Conservatorship of Whitley
Court may not consider litigant’s nonpecuniary motives in litigation to deny attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1021.5. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 8, 2010 | |
B217067
|
Ronald P. Slates APC v. Gorabi
Attorney fees are not recoverable in litigation involving priority of judgments over debtor’s limited assets where enforcement of judgment is not involved. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 7, 2010 | |
08-56667
|
Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures Inc.
Court improperly denies motion for extension to file opposition to summary judgment motion where request was reasonable and would not prejudice parties. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 3, 2010 | |
08-35667
|
State of Montana v. BNSF Railway Co.
Injunction may not issue under Anti-Injunction Act where state court proceeding stemmed from facts related to prior federal proceeding, but involved distinct claims. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 1, 2010 | |
D056206
|
Sevidal v. Target Corp.
Class certification is not proper where there is no way to identify class members who purchased mislabeled products from company’s website. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Oct. 31, 2010 | |
D055852
|
Kovacevic v. Avalon at Eagles’ Crossing Homeowners Association
Vexatious litigant subject to prefiling order precluding propria persona filings is not excused from dismissal of complaint by subsequent retention of counsel. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Oct. 26, 2010 | |
B219584
|
Villacres v. ABM Industries Inc.
Court-approved settlement agreement in class action dismissed without prejudice bars subsequent action by same litigant on same issue raised in previous suit. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Oct. 24, 2010 | |
G043068
|
Baharian-Mehr v. Smith
Appeal of order denying anti-SLAPP motion as frivolous encompasses attorney fee award based on denial of motion. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Oct. 17, 2010 | |
H032417
|
Malatka v. Helm
Prior restraining order is unappealable where defendant failed to bring appeal before subsequent order was granted. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 29, 2010 | |
09-55108
|
Bateman v. American Multi-Cinema Inc.
Court may not deny class certification based on disproportionality of potential damages and actual harm. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 28, 2010 | |
09-35756
|
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell
Although plaintiffs must also satisfy other factors, 'serious questions' test for determining whether to issue preliminary injunctions remains viable. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 23, 2010 | |
C062554
|
Doe v. Lincoln Unified School District
Plaintiff has standing to pursue action against school district under fictitious name in order to protect her privacy. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 22, 2010 | |
S165906
|
Haworth v. Superior Court
Former judge’s past censure over jokingly sexist remarks does not affect his ability to be impartial arbitrator in case involving female litigant. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 3, 2010 | |
09-35716
|
Atlantic National Trust LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Co.
Appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review district court order remanding case to state court on defect grounds. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 3, 2010 | |
A125352
|
115 Cal.Rptr.3d Vanderkous v. Conley
Final submission of case, barring plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal, occurs when court issues statement of decision, regardless of post-submission evidentiary hearings scheduled. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 3, 2010 | |
E048688
|
Force Framing Inc. v. Chinatrust Bank (U.S.A.)
Claimant serving preliminary stop notice on lender listed in preliminary information sheet may have good faith belief entity is actual construction lender. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 1, 2010 | |
C062554
|
Doe v. Lincoln Unified School District
Plaintiff has standing to pursue action against school district under fictitious name in order to protect her privacy. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Aug. 31, 2010 | |
H033913
|
Critzer v. Enos
Court lacks authority to enforce settlement under Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6 where all parties did not give personal consent to settle. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Aug. 31, 2010 | |
B216848
|
Ellerbee v. County of Los Angeles
County cannot be liable for negligence if statute does not impose mandatory duty to ‘promptly’ serve writ of execution. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2010 | |
S162570
|
Murray v. Alaska Airlines Inc.
Agency’s factual findings included in final order precludes plaintiff from taking subsequent action in court against same parties. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Aug. 24, 2010 |