For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Narouz v. Charter Communications LLC
Class representative who settles personal claims while maintaining ‘personal stake’ in class can appeal claims without finding of mootness. 		Civil Procedure Jan. 19, 2010
Hollingsworth v. Perry
Attempted local rule amendment that allowed broadcast of Proposition 8 trial is invalid because it violated federal law. 		Civil Procedure Jan. 15, 2010
U.S. Philips Corp. v. KXD Technology Inc.
Modification of preliminary injunction freezing defendant's assets is void where preliminary injunction had dissolved due to entry of final judgment. 		Civil Procedure Jan. 13, 2010
Cell Therapeutics Inc. v. Lash Group Inc.
By interpreting prior settlement as establishing liability, trial court erroneously precludes qui tam defendant from bringing suit against third party. 		Civil Procedure Jan. 7, 2010
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO CLC v. ConocoPhillips Co.
Predominance requirement for certifying class should be based on actual, apparent issues and not possibility of plaintiff’s theory failing. 		Civil Procedure Jan. 7, 2010
Fink v. Shemtov
Plaintiff in over five cases within past seven years is considered vexatious litigant where decisions were final and adverse to him. 		Civil Procedure Jan. 6, 2010
Biscaro v. Stern
Trial court errs when it denies cognitively disabled person’s courtroom accommodation request for neuropsychologist. 		Civil Procedure Jan. 4, 2010
Kemps v. Beshwate
Innocent confusion does not qualify as illegal conduct that would bar defendants' right to special motion to strike. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 31, 2009
D.R.S. Trading Co. Inc. v. Barnes
Trial court has authority to reconsider motion for relief from default after entry of final judgment. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 24, 2009
Zermeno v. Precis Inc.
New standing provision for unfair competition lawsuits may not be applied retroactively where plaintiffs' settled rights and expectations may be significantly impaired. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 24, 2009
Sakhai v. Zipora
Court need only provide 20 days notice to show cause as to why case should not be dismissed for delay in prosecution. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 23, 2009
In re Vioxx Class Cases
Class certification is denied where individual issues prevailed in claim based on difference in price between drug with adverse effects and safer drug. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 17, 2009
Walton v. Mueller
Debtor cannot seek enforcement of purported settlement, which was created after final judgment, when action is no longer pending. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 17, 2009
Riordan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Plaintiff seeking to recover attorney fees is only required to include prayer for fees in pleadings if fees are element of claim. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 14, 2009
Boston Telecommunications Group Inc. v. Wood
Dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds is improper where California witnesses were important to U.S. citizen’s claim and conduct occurred in California. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 10, 2009
Mohawk Industries Inc. v. Carpenter
Pretrial discovery order compelling disclosure of privileged material is not collaterally reviewable because post-judgment appeal may protect attorney-client privilege. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 9, 2009
Lemoge v. United States
When addressing motion to set aside dismissal, court must explicitly apply 'excusable neglect' framework, which includes consideration of movant's good faith. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 8, 2009
Keller v. Tuesday Morning Inc.
Decertification of class action status for overtime dispute is valid where individual issues predominated over common class issues. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 7, 2009
Tarrant Bell Property LLC v. Superior Court (Abaya)
Reference proceeding where there is possibility of conflicting rulings or poor judicial economy can be denied under discretion of trial court. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 3, 2009
Bates v. Rubio's Restaurants Inc.
Where judge is not disqualified at time of order, judge's order is effective even if contained in same minute order as recusal. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 2, 2009
Nelson v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
Transferee acquires right to pursue punitive damages when such damages were incident to transferable property claim. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 2, 2009
William O. Gilley Enterprises Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Plaintiff asserting federal antitrust claim is estopped from alleging conspiracy under same set of facts already deemed insufficient during previous state litigation. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 2, 2009
PrediWave Corp. v. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Client's cause of action against former attorneys for allegedly allowing CEO to loot company may not be set aside under anti-SLAPP statute. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 2, 2009
One Star Inc. v. Staar Surgical Co.
Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 998, cost-shifting provision is calculated from last unrevoked settlement offer. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 1, 2009
Guessous v. Chrome Hearts LLC
Subsequent domestic lawsuit cannot be stricken under anti-SLAPP motion because original foreign lawsuits are not protected. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 1, 2009
Standard Microsystems Corp. v. Winbond Electronics Corp.
Trial court must provide mandatory relief where defendants’ prior attorney admitted to mistake that led to adverse judgment. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 26, 2009
Carol Gilbert Inc. v. Haller
Summons that lacks reference to defendant's fictitious name does not satisfy notice requirement regardless of notice by other means. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 26, 2009
Align Technology Inc. v. Tran
Although ‘related causes of action’ are compulsorily barred in subsequent suit, court may grant party leave to amend to assert other claims. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 26, 2009
Galleria Plus Inc. v. Hanmi Bank
Notice of motion for sanctions is defective due to failure to specify when motion would be made. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 22, 2009
Padgett v. Wright
Exception to rule prohibiting appeal of denial of summary judgment does not apply where jury already found constitutional violation. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 22, 2009
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.