Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
G036774
|
Goodman v. Lozano
Defendants who pay nothing despite adverse judgment are properly named ‘prevailing party’ for purposes of awarding costs and attorney fees. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 11, 2008 | |
H030596
|
Roybal v. Governing Board of the Salinas City Elementary School District
Attorney fees are not warranted where evidence does not support plaintiffs' award of 'private attorney general' fees. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 8, 2008 | |
B194088
|
Nygård Inc. v. Uusi-Kerttula
Employer’s claims arising from statements made by former employee are properly stricken pursuant to anti-SLAPP motion. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 5, 2008 | |
C053918
|
Noble v. Draper
Plaintiffs’ fraud and unfair business practice claims against defendants are not precluded by prior administrative hearing concerning their wage claims. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 4, 2008 | |
A114442
|
Murphy v. Check 'N Go of California Inc.
In wage and hour case, class action waiver compelling arbitration of misclassified employee's right to overtime pay is exculpatory and unconscionable. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 30, 2008 | |
B198136
|
Doe v. Salesian Society
Plaintiffs’ presentation of limited evidence is insufficient to raise inference that defendant entity had notice of its employee’s unlawful sexual conduct. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 30, 2008 | |
G037363
|
Saxena v. Goffney
Physician is entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict where special verdict form did not require jury to determine whether he committed battery. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 28, 2008 | |
D051293
|
CashCall Inc. v. Superior Court (Cole)
Trial court properly orders precertification discovery in class action for purpose of identifying class members. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 25, 2008 | |
06-35310
|
Contractors Equipment Maintenance Co. Inc. v. Bechtel Hanford Inc.
Supersedeas bond does not encompass judgment against two parties where bond agreement indicates only one party as principal. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 25, 2008 | |
B197077
|
CKE Restaurants v. Moore
Fast food operator fails to show probability of prevailing in action arising from requirement to warn consumers that its fries contain naphthalene. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 25, 2008 | |
05-55739
|
Comedy Club Inc. v. Improv West Associates
Court lacks jurisdiction to review untimely appeal from order compelling arbitration, but confirms arbitrator's authority to resolve disputes arising from trademark agreement. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 24, 2008 | |
B201105
|
Zevnik v. Superior Court (Rayonier Inc.)
Where appellate court affirms decision, only grounds it relied on can establish collateral estoppel. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 23, 2008 | |
05-16614
|
United States v. Approximately $1.67 Million (US) in Cash, Stock, and Other Valuable Assets
Defendant’s drug trafficking interactions within district giving rise to government’s civil forfeiture action are sufficient to invest district court with in rem jurisdiction. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 23, 2008 | |
C050299
|
Burdette v. Carrier Corp.
Claim and issue preclusion bar plaintiff’s slander claims where plaintiff’s same slander claims have already been resolved against him in prior federal action. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 22, 2008 | |
H030905
|
Huh v. Wang
Appellant who fails to act diligently or explain delay is not entitled to relief from summary judgment for excusable attorney neglect. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 18, 2008 | |
H030386
|
Amtower v. Photon Dynamics Inc.
Court should afford litigant protections provided by trial or statutory process rather than utilize motion in limine to adjudicate litigant's claim. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 18, 2008 | |
F049638
|
CDF Firefighters v. Maldonado
Labor union seeking damages from its member must establish all elements of its contractual claim, like any other civil litigant must do. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2008 | |
B199631
|
Puerto v. Superior Court (Wild Oats Markets Inc.)
Court order mandating opt-in notice for party to receive witnesses’ contact information during discovery is abuse of discretion. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2008 | |
B201298
|
Heritage Provider Network Inc. v. Superior Court (Eastland Medical Group Inc.)
Trial court does not have discretion to deny motion to stay proceedings before it involving issues that overlap with controversy in arbitration proceedings. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 15, 2008 | |
B184660
|
Esther B. v. City of Los Angeles
Mandatory relief under Code of Civil Procedure Section 473(b) is not proper where attorney fails to show she represented any taxpayer other than herself. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 14, 2008 | |
D049452
|
Hogar v. Community Development Commission of the City of Escondido
Plaintiff is successful party and entitled to attorney fees where his lawsuit motivated defendant to voluntarily provide relief. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 11, 2008 | |
B195402
|
Nielsen v. Beck
Former attorney's advice to client about 'same subject matter' after substitution presents triable issue tolling statute of limitations for malpractice action. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 9, 2008 | |
06-1164
|
John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
Lawsuit is properly found to be untimely where Federal Circuit addressed timeliness issue sua sponte. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 9, 2008 | |
D049612
|
Otay River Constructors v. San Diego Expressway
Where plaintiff's petition to compel arbitration is deemed action on contract, defendant is prevailing party as matter of law. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 8, 2008 | |
D048643
|
Dicola v. White Bros. Performance Products Inc.
In products liability action, hearsay declaration by plaintiffs' counsel does not raise triable issue showing defendants manufactured and distributed defective product. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 4, 2008 | |
B190190
|
Hirano v. Hirano
Party’s failure to exchange expert information before initial trial date is irrelevant once resultant judgment is reversed and discovery reopened. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 4, 2008 | |
04-17295
|
Bates v. United Parcel Service Inc.
Burden-shifting and qualification standard in 'business necessity' defense does not apply to UPS' discriminatory policy against hearing impaired drivers. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 31, 2007 | |
G038351
|
Engle v. Copenbarger and Copenbarger
Party who secures recovery by accepting statutory offer is entitled to attorney costs and fees unless expressly excluded in offer to compromise. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 27, 2007 | |
A115519
|
Harman v. City and County of San Francisco
Costs for work performed on unsuccessful attorney fee issue in prior appeal must be deleted from total attorney fee award. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 26, 2007 | |
B199605
|
Bell v. Superior Court (H.F. Cox Inc.)
Court improperly denies class certification with respect to overtime and vacation pay claims of hourly employees not excluded by motor carrier exemption. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 24, 2007 |