Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
D082890
|
People v. Barnum
Because evidence sufficiently supported direct aiding and abetting, defendant's first degree murder conviction did not warrant reversal when jury did not specify which theory it relied on to find guilt. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Rubin | Jul. 1, 2025 |
H051237
|
People v. Bray
Probation restriction that defendant refrain from dating, socializing, or forming a romantic relationship with" any person with physical custody of a minor unless approved was unconstitutionally overbroad. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law |
|
L. Rodriguez | Jul. 1, 2025 |
A170047
|
People v. Miller
Defendant charged with felony-murder following the passage of Senate Bill 1437 was not eligible for relief under Penal Code section 1172.6. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Chou | Jul. 1, 2025 |
B341644
|
Teran v. Superior Court (People)
Despite obtaining the information from Los Angeles Sheriff's Department database, former employee did not violate Penal Code section 502(c)(2) because the information was publicly available on the Los Angeles Superior Court website. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Government |
|
C. Moor | Jun. 30, 2025 |
23-656
|
U.S. v. Keller
District court did not err in denying motion to suppress defendant-psychiatrist's journal because the seizure fell within the scope of the search warrant and its seizure was supported by probable cause. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
P. Curiam (9th Cir.) | Jun. 30, 2025 |
23-7809
|
Gutierrez v. Saenz
Death row prisoner had standing to bring section 1983 claim challenging Texas's postconviction DNA testing procedures under the Due Process Clause. |
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
S. Sotomayor | Jun. 27, 2025 |
23-1002
|
Hewitt v. U.S.
The First Step Act confers the benefit of the Act's more lenient penalties to defendants facing post-Act resentencing following vacatur of their pre-Act sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
K. Jackson | Jun. 27, 2025 |
S283169
|
People v. Rhodius
Except for sentencing enhancements for sexually violent offenses, any prior-prison-term enhancement imposed prior to 2020 is legally invalid, regardless of whether it was actually executed or stayed. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. Kruger | Jun. 27, 2025 |
S283326
|
People v. Wiley
Overruling *People v. Towne*, California Supreme Court determined that trial court, in imposing the upper term based on aggravating facts not decided by a jury, engaged in impermissible fact finding. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Corrigan | Jun. 27, 2025 |
C096306
|
People v. Trent
Vacatur of defendant's murder conviction under Penal Code section 1172.6 rendered his gang offense "nonfinal" for purposes of the retroactive application of Assembly Bill No. 333. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
P. Krause | Jun. 26, 2025 |
B335987
|
People v. Dixon
Criminal defendant was not eligible to have his death sentence reduced under Penal Code Section 1172.75 because habeas corpus remained the exclusive method for collaterally attacking such a sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Segal | Jun. 26, 2025 |
A168292
|
People v. Munoz
Despite not requiring unanimity amongst jurors as to which specific overt act was required for conspiracy to commit murder, jury instructions did not violate Sixth Amendment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Chou | Jun. 26, 2025 |
F089603
|
In re Brissette
Penal code sections 1172.2 and 1170.1(c) are not irreconcilable--the latest court to impose a sentence in a multiple-case situation is the sentencing court, which then becomes the court to rule on compassionate release. |
Habeas Corpus, Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Franson | Jun. 25, 2025 |
G063231
|
People v. Ramos
No evidentiary error when trial court admitted transcripts from co-participant's jury trial to determine that defendant was ineligible for Penal Code section 1172.6 resentencing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Evidence |
|
E. Moore | Jun. 25, 2025 |
F087907
|
People v. Walts
Protective order forbidding convicted sex offender from contacting his ex-wife and two of his children was inappropriate where they were not named as victims of his underlying offense of conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
T. DeSantos | Jun. 25, 2025 |
S124131
|
People v. Barrett
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing evidence of defendant's violent character after defense counsel sought to introduce evidence of victim's violent character. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Groban | Jun. 24, 2025 |
23-7483
|
Esteras v. U.S.
District court considering revoking supervised release may not consider whether the punishment reflects the seriousness of the offense, promotes respect for the law, or provides just punishment for the offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Barrett | Jun. 23, 2025 |
B331391
|
People v. Sinay
Trial court retained jurisdiction to award over $900,000 restitution to victim's family 30 years after defendant's initial sentencing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Gilbert | Jun. 19, 2025 |
23-2101
|
U.S. v. Barry
Probable cause existed to search non-residence apartment under the parolee-search condition exception where parolee had a key to the apartment and showed intimate familiarity with it. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law |
|
P. Bumatay | Jun. 18, 2025 |
B338852
|
People v. American Surety Co.
Because criminal court failed to forfeit bond after defendant's initial disappearance, it lost jurisdiction and civil court erred in not vacating forfeiture and exonerating bail. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
H. Baltodano | Jun. 18, 2025 |
A171414
|
People v. Lewis
Issuance of involuntary antipsychotic medication order without a full evidentiary hearing did not violate defendant's procedural due process rights. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law |
|
J. Richman | Jun. 13, 2025 |
23-1345
|
Rivers v. Guerrero
Petition filed after district court has entered judgment on an initial habeas petition but before appeal is resolved qualifies as a successive petition and must satisfy AEDPA's requirements. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
K. Jackson | Jun. 13, 2025 |
23-15594
|
Brown v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada
Unplanned ex parte contact between witness for prosecution, her friend, and several jurors was trial error but did not warrant relief because it did not prejudice the defendant. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Brown | Jun. 13, 2025 |
S179454
|
Modification: People v. Jasso
Admission of detective's testimony regarding accomplice's friend's statements made during interview was not error where accomplice's statements were against his interest and defense counsel did not object to detective's testimony. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. Kruger | Jun. 13, 2025 |
G063201
|
People v. Ortega
Trial court properly denied youthful offender's Penal Code section 1170(d)(1)(A)'s resentencing request when defendant did not meet statutory requirements and equal protection argument was moot. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
E. Moore | Jun. 16, 2025 |
H050597
|
People v. Wagstaff
By failing to raise the issue to the trial court, Black defendant forfeited his argument that trial court's statement "you're a strong young buck" violated the Racial Justice Act. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Greenwood | Jun. 16, 2025 |
B323666
|
People v. Wilson
Defense counsel was not ineffective as a matter of law for failing to object to prosecutor's referral to the Black defendant as a "gorilla pimp" during closing arguments to the jury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
K. Yegan | Jun. 11, 2025 |
C101167
|
People v. Nixon
Where defendant used social media to make death threats, complete ban from social media as a condition of release was not unconstitutionally overbroad. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. Mauro | Jun. 9, 2025 |
B333606
|
People v. Nino
Trial court improperly denied Penal Code section 1172.6 resentencing request when, despite being the actual killer, defendant could have been convicted under the now invalid second-degree felony murder statute. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
G. Feuer | Jun. 6, 2025 |
B337664
|
People v. Grajeda
Resentencing court's decision denying defendant's request to postpone Penal Code section 1172.75 hearing (invalid prison priors) to allow him to speak with his attorney violated his right to counsel. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Segal | Jun. 5, 2025 |