| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
23-1439
|
U.S. v. Stennerson
Prohibition on possession of firearms by unlawful drug users did not facially violate the Second Amendment because it was consistent with the nation's history and tradition of firearm regulations. |
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Forrest | Sep. 10, 2025 |
|
24-3374
|
Jones v. City of North Las Vegas
Though officers' warrantless backyard entry was unlawful due to their tardiness in pursuing fleeing suspect, individual officer's shooting of attacking dogs after entry was entitled to qualified immunity. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Immunity |
|
S. Mendoza | Sep. 9, 2025 |
|
23-2282
|
U.S. v. Jesenik
Omissions tethered to affirmative misstatements to investors were sufficient to support wire fraud convictions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Hurwitz | Sep. 8, 2025 |
|
F088488
|
In re Grinder
Rule prohibiting use of hearsay testimony to prove a commitment offense involved the use of force or violence was procedural, rather than substantive, and did not apply retroactively. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Franson | Sep. 8, 2025 |
|
S151493
|
People v. Cardenas
Gang-murder special circumstance and death sentence reversed where changes to the laws on admissibility of hearsay evidence and required predicates meant there was now insufficient evidence to support the allegations. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. Kruger | Sep. 5, 2025 |
|
G065079
|
Segura v. Superior Court (People)
For misdemeanor pretrial military diversion eligibility, veterans need only show a reasonable possibility of a service-related condition, not a nexus to the offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
E. Moore | Sep. 4, 2025 |
|
C098819
|
People v. Parker
Trial court declining to give Judicial Council instruction on voluntary intoxication was not error where it provided an instruction that, when considered alongside other instructions, properly instructed the jury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
P. Krause | Sep. 4, 2025 |
|
24-1244
|
U.S. v. Taylor
District court revoking supervised release may sanction defendant based on violent history, breach of trust, and recidivism risk by imposing a lengthier sentence than suggested by Sentencing Guidelines. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
S. Ikuta | Sep. 4, 2025 |
|
D083280
|
People v. Hart
Personal use of a firearm was not an ultimate fact of murder, so jury's not true finding regarding firearm allegation did not have preclusive effect on murder resentencing proceedings. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Buchanan | Sep. 3, 2025 |
|
C101402
|
People v. Isayev
Youthful offender's eligibility for Penal Code section 3051's Youth Offender Parole Program made him ineligible for Penal Code section 11709(d) resentencing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
P. Krause | Sep. 3, 2025 |
|
B340795
|
Arriaga v. Superior Court (People)
Delay of almost sixteen years between felony complaint and arraignment violated defendant's speedy trial right where the delay resulted in the loss of testimony that would have assisted his defense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Adams | Sep. 3, 2025 |
|
A168758
|
People v. Midell
Defense counsel's repeated comparisons of defendant to an animal during closing to negate intent elements were invited error and could not serve as basis for Racial Justice Act claim. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
T. Desautels | Sep. 2, 2025 |
|
F088265
|
People v. Baldwin
Limiting resentencing to juvenile offenders expressly sentenced to life without the possibility of parole rather than those serving a term of years with parole eligibility did not violate equal protection. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
K. Meehan | Aug. 29, 2025 |
|
A168697
|
People v. Mendez-Torres
Modified jury instruction that defined the force required for robbery without any reference to the victim's physical resistance misstated the law and required reversal. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Chou | Aug. 29, 2025 |
|
S175660
|
People v. Aguirre
Retroactive application of Assembly Bill 333 invalidated death row inmate's gang-related enhancements, special circumstance, and death sentence due to prejudicial instructional error under outdated law. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
P. Guerrero | Aug. 29, 2025 |
|
23-2342
|
U.S. v. Hunt
Despite defendant retaining a privacy interest in abandoned iPhone, because the subsequent search was warrant-based and reasonable, there was no Fourth Amendment violation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Evidence |
|
K. Lee | Aug. 28, 2025 |
|
B337683
|
People v. Gutierrez
Upon prima facie showing for relief under Penal Code section 1473.7 (insufficient advisement of immigration consequences), a court is required to appoint counsel to an indigent defendant. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Kim | Aug. 27, 2025 |
|
20-50182
|
U.S. v. Olivas
District court did not plainly err by admitting expert's opinion that gang "secretaries," such as defendant, know "everything" about gang activities because the statements were not explicitly about defendant's mental state. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Nelson | Aug. 26, 2025 |
|
S281282
|
People v. Fletcher
Assembly Bill 333's narrowed gang definitions apply to the determination of whether a prior conviction qualifies as a serious or violent felony for purposes of the Three Strikes law and prior serious felony enhancements. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
G. Liu | Aug. 26, 2025 |
|
B336249
|
Modification: People v. Wright
Despite the trial court providing incorrect jury instructions regarding the defendant's involuntary intoxication defense, because the overall evidence displayed the required intent for robbery, the error was harmless. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Wiley | Aug. 25, 2025 |
|
B336249
|
People v. Wright
Despite the trial court providing incorrect jury instructions regarding the defendant's involuntary intoxication defense, because the overall evidence displayed the required intent for robbery, the error was harmless. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Wiley | Aug. 22, 2025 |
|
B341793
|
People v. Singleton
Trial court lacked jurisdiction to resentence defendant to longer term even though the defendant's initial sentence was unauthorized. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
G. Feuer | Aug. 22, 2025 |
|
22-10310
|
U.S. v. Manning
In light of *United States v. Barker*, courts may not bifurcate a trial on the different elements of a single Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering (VICAR) murder charge. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Bress | Aug. 21, 2025 |
|
A166451
|
People v. Dejesus-Galindo
Because jury instructions on propensity evidence did not lower the standard of proof and evidence overwhelmingly supported jury's guilty verdict, any instructional error was harmless. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Clay | Aug. 20, 2025 |
|
24-2371
|
Gonzalez v. Herrera
The First Step Act's time credit scheme allows for the reduction in length of a supervised release term. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
S. Mendoza | Aug. 20, 2025 |
|
C102211
|
Gomez v. Superior Court (People)
Trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff's mental health diversion request when prosecution failed to rebut the presumption that the mental disorder was a causal factor. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
S. Boulware Eurie | Aug. 19, 2025 |
|
24-327
|
Amended Opinion: U.S. v. Plancarte
Government did not breach plea agreement by submitting supplemental memorandum opining about defendant's "worrying" conduct and past arrest history. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
S. Ikuta | Aug. 19, 2025 |
|
S089619
|
People v. Alvarez
Trial court did not err in denying motion to sever two murder trials, where similarities in both murders rendered evidence cross-admissible to establish intent and lack of mistake. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Groban | Aug. 19, 2025 |
|
S277995
|
People v. Cannon
Jury trial waiver procedure under the Sexually Violent Predators Act should be subject only to rational-basis review because it does not implicate a fundamental right or interest. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Corrigan | Aug. 19, 2025 |
|
A170942
|
People v. Skaggs
Trial court erred by construing non-statutory motion to dismiss on constitutional due process grounds as a section 1385 motion, which led it to incorrectly conclude that it lacked authority to consider the motion. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
I. Petrou | Aug. 18, 2025 |
