For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Superior Court (Lalo)
Granting discovery request pursuant to the Racial Justice Act was improper where the defendant failed to demonstrate the requisite "good cause" based on specific facts. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/2 Sep. 26, 2025
Ahn v. Parisotto
Despite subsequent in-the-interest-of-justice dismissal, criminal defendant's guilty plea for receiving illegal kickbacks in exchange for patient referrals meant his suspension from the workers' compensation system was statutorily required. 		Workers' Compensation, Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/4 Sep. 26, 2025
Hernandez v. Superior Court (People)
Defendant's case was dismissed for violating speedy trial rights when prosecutor's other case was not "in progress" under Penal Code section 1050(g)(2) and was not good cause for a continuance. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/5 Sep. 26, 2025
U.S. v. Metcalf
Dismissal was required where plausible reading of state law meant defendant had no notice that his conduct potentially violated federal law prohibiting possession of firearms in school zones. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Sep. 24, 2025
People v. Venancio
Resentencing petitioner was ineligible for relief as a matter of law because record of conviction showed he was convicted under a provocative act theory, which was still valid under current law. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/3 Sep. 23, 2025
People v. Pierce
Reasonable jurors could have concluded defendant had implied malice where he demonstrated predrinking intent to drive and engaged in a street race with a blood-alcohol level three times the legal limit. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 5DCA Sep. 19, 2025
Angulo v. Superior Court (People)
Under Penal Code section 1001.80, military diversion eligibility extends to any current or former service member with a qualifying service-related condition, imposing no minimum service requirement. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/2 Sep. 18, 2025
Mendoza v. Superior Court (People)
An arraignment or plea on an amended complaint does not restart the statutory 60-day period for holding a preliminary hearing under Penal Code section 859b. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/3 Sep. 17, 2025
People v. Garcia
Because mental health diversion is disallowed in DUI cases, trial court did not err in denying mental health diversion for defendant when her case involved both DUI and non-DUI charges. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/1 Sep. 17, 2025
U.S. v. Boudreau
Defendant's motion to suppress was properly denied when warrant to search his residence was supported by probable cause based on his specific grooming conduct. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Sep. 17, 2025
U.S. v. Patrick
Federal penalty statute allowed district court to simultaneously enter a total fine amount "due immediately" while establishing an installment schedule for payment due to defendant's indigent status. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Sep. 16, 2025
People v. Millsap
Trial court lacked concurrent jurisdiction to resentence criminal defendant while his automatic capital appeal was pending before the Supreme Court because it had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/4 Sep. 15, 2025
People v. Orozco
Amending information to include conspiracy to commit murder charge right before jury selection was improper because the offense had not been shown by evidence at the preliminary hearing. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/8 Sep. 12, 2025
Modification: People v. Mendez-Torres
Modified jury instruction that defined the force required for robbery without any reference to the victim's physical resistance misstated the law and required reversal. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/5 Sep. 12, 2025
People v. Mills
Reversal was not warranted where elderly criminal defendant with prior strikes sought reconsideration of his sentence to make him eligible for parole before the end of his life expectancy. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/6 Sep. 11, 2025
People v. Ball
Felony brandishing a firearm at a person in a motor vehicle does not require a showing that the victim experienced subjective fear. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/3 Sep. 11, 2025
U.S. v. Keast
District court erred when calculating defendant's sentence because his prior Oregon conviction for unlawful use of a weapon with a firearm enhancement did not constitute a "crime of violence" under the Sentencing Guidelines. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Sep. 11, 2025
U.S. v. Green
District court did not abuse its discretion in denying criminal defendant pre-trial discovery related to selective enforcement claim where the defendant used a small sample size to support his motion. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Sep. 11, 2025
People v. Garcia
Trial and appellate courts lacked jurisdiction to rule on defendant's statutorily unauthorized petition to vacate fees when his conviction was final. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/2 Sep. 10, 2025
U.S. v. Stennerson
Prohibition on possession of firearms by unlawful drug users did not facially violate the Second Amendment because it was consistent with the nation's history and tradition of firearm regulations. 		Constitutional Law, Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Sep. 10, 2025
Jones v. City of North Las Vegas
Though officers' warrantless backyard entry was unlawful due to their tardiness in pursuing fleeing suspect, individual officer's shooting of attacking dogs after entry was entitled to qualified immunity. 		Criminal Law and Procedure, Immunity 9th Sep. 9, 2025
U.S. v. Jesenik
Omissions tethered to affirmative misstatements to investors were sufficient to support wire fraud convictions. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Sep. 8, 2025
In re Grinder
Rule prohibiting use of hearsay testimony to prove a commitment offense involved the use of force or violence was procedural, rather than substantive, and did not apply retroactively. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 5DCA Sep. 8, 2025
People v. Cardenas
Gang-murder special circumstance and death sentence reversed where changes to the laws on admissibility of hearsay evidence and required predicates meant there was now insufficient evidence to support the allegations. 		Criminal Law and Procedure CASC Sep. 5, 2025
Segura v. Superior Court (People)
For misdemeanor pretrial military diversion eligibility, veterans need only show a reasonable possibility of a service-related condition, not a nexus to the offense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/3 Sep. 4, 2025
People v. Parker
Trial court declining to give Judicial Council instruction on voluntary intoxication was not error where it provided an instruction that, when considered alongside other instructions, properly instructed the jury. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 3DCA Sep. 4, 2025
U.S. v. Taylor
District court revoking supervised release may sanction defendant based on violent history, breach of trust, and recidivism risk by imposing a lengthier sentence than suggested by Sentencing Guidelines. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Sep. 4, 2025
People v. Hart
Personal use of a firearm was not an ultimate fact of murder, so jury's not true finding regarding firearm allegation did not have preclusive effect on murder resentencing proceedings. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Sep. 3, 2025
People v. Isayev
Youthful offender's eligibility for Penal Code section 3051's Youth Offender Parole Program made him ineligible for Penal Code section 11709(d) resentencing. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 3DCA Sep. 3, 2025
Arriaga v. Superior Court (People)
Delay of almost sixteen years between felony complaint and arraignment violated defendant's speedy trial right where the delay resulted in the loss of testimony that would have assisted his defense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/3 Sep. 3, 2025
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.