| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
H050042
|
Modification: Wozniak v. YouTube, LLC
Trial court abused discretion in denying leave to amend claims alleging that Google and YouTube materially contributed to cryptocurrency scams. |
Cyber Law |
|
C. Wilson | Apr. 4, 2024 |
|
H050042
|
Wozniak v. YouTube, LLC
Trial court abused discretion in denying leave to amend claims alleging that Google and YouTube materially contributed to cryptocurrency scams. |
Cyber Law |
|
C. Wilson | Mar. 19, 2024 |
|
21-16182
|
Rigsby v. GoDaddy, Inc.
GoDaddy.com, as a domain name registrant, is an interactive computer service that falls within the Communication Decency Act's protections. |
Cyber Law |
|
M. McKeown | Feb. 6, 2023 |
|
H047714
|
Prager University v. Google LLC
Suit asserting various state law claims against Youtube for exercising publisher's traditional editorial functions was precluded by the plain language of the Communications Decency Act. |
Cyber Law |
|
C. Lie | Dec. 7, 2022 |
|
21-16560
|
City of Reno v. Netflix Inc.
City's action against video streaming providers for alleged failure to pay franchise fees failed under Nevada's Video Service Law because statute did not confer a right of action on the city. |
Cyber Law |
|
P. Curiam (9th Cir.) | Oct. 31, 2022 |
|
21-56293
|
Jane Does No. 1-6 v. Reddit Inc.
Reddit was shielded from liability for their users' posts of sexually explicit images of minors because they did not knowingly benefit from the alleged sex trafficking. |
Cyber Law |
|
M. Smith | Oct. 25, 2022 |
|
21-15430
|
ACA Connects v. Bonta
California law regulating broadband service providers was not preempted by FCC's federal regulatory authority because the FCC relinquished the authority to regulate the service providers when it reclassified them. |
Cyber Law |
|
M. Schroeder | Jan. 31, 2022 |
|
A158854
|
Greenberg v. Digital Media Solutions, LLC
Plaintiffs were not precluded from filing action under Business and Professions Code Section 17529.5(a)(2) because they alleged defendant's marketing partners failed to identify themselves in email domain names. |
Cyber Law |
|
J. Humes | Jun. 23, 2021 |
|
18-16700
|
Gonzalez v. Google
Plaintiff's claims that Google was directly and secondarily liable for ISIS's acts of international terrorism were barred pursuant to Section 230 of Communications Decency Act. |
Cyber Law |
|
M. Christen | Jun. 23, 2021 |
|
19-783
|
Van Buren v. U.S.
'Exceeds authorized access' clause of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act does not extend to those who access computer with authorization but for an improper purpose. |
Cyber Law |
|
A. Barrett | Jun. 4, 2021 |
|
19-36039
|
Clare v. Clare
Summary judgment was reversed because husband's unauthorized access into his wife's work e-mails could constitute violation of Stored Communications Act. |
Cyber Law |
|
M. Hawkins | Dec. 9, 2020 |
|
17-17351
|
Amended Opinion: Enigma Software v. Malwarebytes, Inc.
The immunity provided in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does not apply to software that the provider finds objectionable for anti-competitive reasons. |
Cyber Law |
|
M. Schroeder | Jan. 2, 2020 |
|
17-17351
|
Enigma Software v. Malwarebytes, Inc.
The immunity provided in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does not apply to software that the provider finds objectionable for anti-competitive reasons. |
Cyber Law |
|
M. Schroeder | Sep. 13, 2019 |
|
17-16783
|
HiQ Labs v. LinkedIn Corp.
Preliminary injunction was properly granted by the district court since plaintiff made sufficient showings of the elements set forth by 'Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc.' |
Cyber Law |
|
M. Berzon | Sep. 10, 2019 |
For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390. To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com