Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
00-3098
|
Sanjuan v. IBP Inc.
Kansas employer retaliated against worker for exercising rights under workers' compensation law. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 31, 2002 | |
00-15796
|
Bailey v. Southwest Gas Co.
Employee's termination did not violate Family and Medical Leave Act or public policy. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 27, 2002 | |
99-17447
|
Morton v. United Parcel Service Inc.
Employer may have discriminated against hearing-impaired worker by refusing to accommodate disability. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 23, 2002 | |
99-17205
|
Bergene v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
Summary judgment in employer's favor was improper where triable issues of fact existed regarding sex discrimination, retaliation and constructive discharge. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 22, 2002 | |
00-1089
|
Toyota Motor Manufacturing v. Williams
Disability under federal law must substantially limit performance of tasks that are of central importance to daily life. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 14, 2002 | |
19024-2
|
Weems v. North Franklin School District
School district employee may be terminated for falsifying records without consideration of remediability. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 14, 2002 | |
B146712
|
Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los Angeles
Police sergeant's only opportunity for review of transfer and pay downgrade is by administrative appeal rather than arbitration. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 11, 2002 | |
98-16799
|
Swenson v. Potter
Jury's conclusion that employer's response to allegations of sexual harassment wasn't prompt and adequate wasn't supported by record. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 10, 2002 | |
47887-7
|
Davis v. Microsoft Corp.
Employee terminated because he could not work overtime was not subject to disability discrimination. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 10, 2002 | |
01-3019
|
Goodwin v. General Motors Corp.
Employer faces trial on charges that African-American employee was paid less than similarly-situated white employees. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 9, 2002 | |
B135121
|
Gunnell v. Metrocolor Laboratories Inc.
Employee injured after employer deliberately exposed him to hazardous chemicals is limited to workers' compensation benefits. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 7, 2002 | |
A090680
|
Birschtein v. New United Motor Manufacturing Inc.
Under circumstances of case, employee's staring at fellow employee may constitute gender-based harassment, therefore summary judgment was improper. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 7, 2002 | |
00-6208
|
Watts v. City of Norman
Termination of fire captain for striking subordinate was not pretext for racial discrimination. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 7, 2002 | |
46715-8
|
Blinka v. Washington State Bar Association
Employee terminated after providing negative deposition testimony regarding employer failed to establish retaliatory discharge and wrongful termination. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 4, 2002 | |
70254-3
|
Sedlacek v. Hillis
Non-disabled employee allegedly terminated because of association with disabled spouse has no state tort claim for wrongful discharge. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 21, 2001 | |
S087484
|
Richards v. CH2M Hill Inc.
Disability discrimination that occurred after one-year deadline is actionable if it is sufficiently similar to unlawful conduct within limitations period. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 20, 2001 | |
69091-0
|
Snyder v. Medical Services Corp. of Eastern Washington
Trial court properly dismissed employee's lawsuit against former employer. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 18, 2001 | |
00-2040
|
McCowan v. All Star Maintenance Inc.
Workers of Mexican origin complaining of racial epithets may bring discrimination claim. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 10, 2001 | |
00-3150
|
Aquilino v. University of Kansas
Removal from dissertation committee did not constitute adverse employment action after professor's tenure was already denied. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 6, 2001 | |
99-15645
|
Costa v. Desert Palace Inc.
Without substantial evidence of discriminatory animus by employer, court may not give mixed-motive instruction to jury in wrongful termination case. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 6, 2001 | |
00-5168
|
Cooper v. Central & Southwest Services
Termination of employee while receiving temporary total disability is violation of Oklahoma's Workers' Compensation Act. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 4, 2001 | |
98-3208
|
Thiessen v. General Electric Capital Corp.
District court abuses discretion in decertifying class and dismissing individual claims of age discrimination. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 29, 2001 | |
46976-2
|
Tinjum v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Diabetic truck driver's discrimination claim not entitled to summary judgment because he fails to show job solely involved intrastate commerce. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 21, 2001 | |
98CA2566
|
Robinson v. City and County of Denver
Success of hostile work environment claim depends on totality of circumstances. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 20, 2001 | |
99-55519
|
Michael v. Riverside Cement Company Pension Plan
ERISA violation is found where pension plan amendment reduced early retirement payments. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 19, 2001 | |
00-35412
|
Baldwin v. Trailer Inns Inc.
Court correctly grants summary judgment for employer on employees' overtime claim under federal act, but summary judgment improper on contract breach claim. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 19, 2001 | |
98-55853
|
Regula v. Delta Family-Care Disability Survivorship Plan
Court should've determined whether ERISA plan had conflict of interest before applying deferential standard of review to plan's decision to discontinue benefits. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 19, 2001 | |
00-758
|
U.S. Postal Service v. Gregory
Merit Systems Protection Board may independently review pending discipline against employee to determine if current discipline is reasonable. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 18, 2001 | |
47839-7
|
Stahl v. Delicor of Puget Sound
Driver of delivery truck is not exempt from overtime requirements of state minimum wage law. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 15, 2001 | |
46991-6
|
Mitchell v. Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals
Veteran with minimal qualifications was not entitled to employment preference. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 15, 2001 |